The second paragraph of your post was easily the most insightful part....See, I still don’t think we would. It’s a terrible business strategy from a planning perspective and I reckon we’d prefer to allocate more cap space to Grant for a guaranteed number of years, rather than going down the PO path. If he declines then we’d move on.
The fact that we’re looking to remove Moses’ PO suggests the same as he is a better and more valuable commodity than Grant.