Rumours and Stuff

[T-Boon]

In my crystal ball I think the court will rule the release clause invalid due to demise of R360 being outside Zac’s control, and that had he known R360 wasn’t going to happen we would not have agreed to such a clause.

the clause being overturned will lead to the court stating as original “owners” of the contract, we can legally enforce Zac to return to the eels and recommence the existing contract. As we no longer want Zac, potentially don’t even have the capacity cap-wise to do so even if we wanted him, that we must agreed to a termination without conditions, with a nominal financial settlement from Zac to be paid to the club (benefits us in zero way really)

I genuinely think we’ll be told to choose between taking Zac back, or giving him an unencumbered release. We won’t be choosing option 1.

I’d select 1. Then offer him around.

 

[Gary Gutful]

2 and half inch Tigerman.

Two and a Half Tigers

 

[Stevie]

I’ll update you guys later but having a bbq with someone inside the club. Have loads of goss from players. Not all of it terrific tbh.

I’ll log in later and share properly otherwise tomorrow.

Summary is a lot more disharmony than you’d realise. Some of the players unhappy pisses me off because they spent plenty of time injured.

Ryles is VERY structured from a players point of view. Huge disharmony from players with Jim and and Mon. Huge frustration in the squad depth.

 

[Gary Gutful]

I genuinely think we’ll be told to choose between taking Zac back, or giving him an unencumbered release. We won’t be choosing option 1.

If we do take him back then I'd recommend some 'one on one' coaching withe Browny.

 

[Lemon Squash]

I’ll update you guys later but having a bbq with someone inside the club. Have loads of goss from players. Not all of it terrific tbh.

I’ll log in later and share properly otherwise tomorrow.

Summary is a lot more disharmony than you’d realise. Some of the players unhappy pisses me off because they spent plenty of time injured.

Ryles is VERY structured from a players point of view. Huge disharmony from players with Jim and and Mon. Huge frustration in the squad depth.

Make sure he always has a beer in his hand, get him well buzzed so he leaks like a sieve.

 

[hindy111]

Make sure he always has a beer in his hand, get him well buzzed so he leaks like a sieve.

Slip him a mickey

 

[TheCrowe]

In my crystal ball I think the court will rule the release clause invalid due to demise of R360 being outside Zac’s control, and that had he known R360 wasn’t going to happen we would not have agreed to such a clause.

the clause being overturned will lead to the court stating as original “owners” of the contract, we can legally enforce Zac to return to the eels and recommence the existing contract. As we no longer want Zac, potentially don’t even have the capacity cap-wise to do so even if we wanted him, that we must agreed to a termination without conditions, with a nominal financial settlement from Zac to be paid to the club (benefits us in zero way really)

I genuinely think we’ll be told to choose between taking Zac back, or giving him an unencumbered release. We won’t be choosing option 1.

It would be highly unlikely the contract would specifically mention R360 (especially with a 10yr ban hanging overhead). It will come down to the skill of the lawyers that wrote it and the skill of our representation in court. He can just go play rugby for 3 years if nothing can be worked out.

 

[Tiger5150]

You literally contradicted yourself here.

I'd like you to literally point our how and where. I literally quoted stare decisis and explained that common Law is literally the binding nature of previous cases, at least the Ratio Decendi is.

 

[Tiger5150]

View attachment 109191

Reminds me that KingTigersman passed away a couple of weeks ago. Vale King Tigersman

 

[Tiger5150]

That is my teenage years.

I’m talking about the tiger.

Always assumed you'd be a furry.

 

[85 Baby]

Always assumed you'd be a furry.

I lived a little. You should try it.

 

[Gary Gutful]

I'd like you to literally point our how and where. I literally quoted stare decisis and explained that common Law is literally the binding nature of previous cases, at least the Ratio Decendi is.

With respect, without prejudice and strictly sub judice, I must object in limine to both the form and substance of your submission, which appears to proceed per incuriam and with reckless abandon for the doctrines it purports to invoke.

You demand that he “literally point out how and where,” yet having already ipse dixit quoted stare decisis and inter alia paraphrased the binding force of the ratio decidendi, you now seek further particularisation as though this were a pleading requiring strictissimi juris compliance. That position is, frankly, non sequitur.

The common law, ex hypothesi, operates ex post facto through precedent, not by vibes, interpretive vibes notwithstanding. To suggest otherwise would be contra bonos mores, ultra vires, and arguably res ipsa loquitur in its own absurdity. The ratio binds; the obiter flirts; the court follows unless distinguendum est or the precedent is manifestly wrong. This is not controversial—this is black-letter law, ab initio, ipso facto, QED.

Accordingly, your request for further elucidation is dismissed summarily, de minimis, and mutatis mutandis on the basis that the point has already been established on the balance of probabilities, beyond reasonable doubt, and possibly even beyond all known jurisprudence.

Costs to follow.

 

[85 Baby]

nates meas oscula

 

[Poupou Escobar]

I'd like you to literally point our how and where. I literally quoted stare decisis and explained that common Law is literally the binding nature of previous cases, at least the Ratio Decendi is.

Expecto patronum ffs

 

[Poupou Escobar]

QED

Can’t believe you missed this opportunity

 

[Grimmace]

I’ll update you guys later but having a bbq with someone inside the club. Have loads of goss from players. Not all of it terrific tbh.

I’ll log in later and share properly otherwise tomorrow.

Summary is a lot more disharmony than you’d realise. Some of the players unhappy pisses me off because they spent plenty of time injured.

Ryles is VERY structured from a players point of view. Huge disharmony from players with Jim and and Mon. Huge frustration in the squad depth.

If it’s true they’re the players you want out of the club anyway. Matterson , Simonsson etc etc sooks like their mate Zachery . Imagine complaining about a professional structured program when you’ve dished up undisciplined rubbish since 2022.

 

[emjaycee]

I’ll update you guys later but having a bbq with someone inside the club. Have loads of goss from players. Not all of it terrific tbh.

I’ll log in later and share properly otherwise tomorrow.

Summary is a lot more disharmony than you’d realise. Some of the players unhappy pisses me off because they spent plenty of time injured.

Ryles is VERY structured from a players point of view. Huge disharmony from players with Jim and and Mon. Huge frustration in the squad depth.

Make sure you tell us the name of your source.

 

[Delboy]

Make sure you tell us the name of your source.

That’s the way to get rumours, let everyone know who leaked it. Seriously

 

[Gary Gutful]

Can’t believe you missed this opportunity

Sloppy effort.

 

[Gary Gutful]

That’s the way to get rumours, let everyone know who leaked it. Seriously

I don’t think he was being serious.