65th minute. Only played 1 minute less than Latimore.Good young forwad like Blake Laurie has to wait till the 70 th minute and the game won before he gets a chance.Demoralizing.Sack Macgregor
That’s fair.Jury is out until a finals game is won
If cowboys scored a late try Laurie zero minutes.If laltimore got 16 minutes it just shows Macgregor doesn't know how to utilize the bench Sack Macgregor65th minute. Only played 1 minute less than Latimore.
If you’re wrong about basic provable facts then...?If cowboys scored a late try Laurie zero minutes.If laltimore got 16 minutes it just shows Macgregor doesn't know how to utilize the bench Sack Macgregor
Just have a look at the ladder,tell me which team sits at the top and who is that team coached by?What makes you think he is a "GREAT" coach?
Great is a very strong word. It usually means one of the best ever. One to be remembered. At least that's how I see it.
And Paul McGregor is not one of the best ever in my humble opinion.
Melbourne StormJust have a look at the ladder,tell me which team sits at the top and who is that team coached by?
well sack Mary then. Its just not good enoughMelbourne Storm
Craig Bellamy
If you have read many of my posts I am one of the few who supports and defends Mary. Ive been doing it for years. I don't think he should be sacked at all, he has this team playing some very good footy and deserves credit for having them in the top 4.well sack Mary then. Its just not good enough
9 posts in and you already want to Sack Mary. Harden up.well sack Mary then. Its just not good enough
Agreedwell sack Mary then. Its just not good enough
Just have a look at the ladder,tell me which team sits at the top and who is that team coached by?
If we have overachieved and sit on top of the ladder and still need two centres and a winger, isn’t that a credit to the coach. The poor barstard can’t win, if we were 5th or 6th you would want him sacked but we are on top of the ladder with only half a top grade backline he still has stuffed up. ??????I seriously think that we have overachieved so far the season. If we had a top line winger instead of Nightingale and a top line pair of centres, then I think we would be genuine premiership contenders. Mary' pick and stick policy is working to our detriment now. Players such as Lomax, Herbert and Pereira should have all been given a chance earlier in the season.
No it isn't a credit to the coach that he continues to pick the wrong players. It is a credit to our forwards, halves and Dufty that we are sitting equal first on the ladder. It would be credit to the coach if he had promoted some new blood in place of Nightingale, Aitken and Lafai.If we have overachieved and sit on top of the ladder and still need two centres and a winger, isn’t that a credit to the coach. The poor barstard can’t win, if we were 5th or 6th you would want him sacked but we are on top of the ladder with only half a top grade backline he still has stuffed up. ??????
And if he promoted new blood and it didn’t work there would be outrage on this forum that he did it. As I said, the poor barstard can’t winNo it isn't a credit to the coach that he continues to pick the wrong players. It is a credit to our forwards, halves and Dufty that we are sitting equal first on the ladder. It would be credit to the coach if he had promoted some new blood in place of Nightingale, Aitken and Lafai.
No point making changes now. Have to wait until end of season.Personally, I'm of the opinion that Mary can see out his contract, but short of a prem (or mayyyybe prelim) we go elsewhere after that point.
I 100% see no point in sacking him now though. Anything short of a prelim this year should be putting his job under pressure immediately
I do agree with you that he has to produce the goods at business end of the season. But remember this our financial situation is run by the NRL because of our debt. So if Mary was to go don’t think for a minute that we are going to get some high profile coach with a CV thicker than your arm. The NRL has the last say on what we spend whether we like it or not. Until we make substantial inroads into clearing our debt, nothing will change. It’s called financial management.Personally, I'm of the opinion that Mary can see out his contract, but short of a prem (or mayyyybe prelim) we go elsewhere after that point.
I 100% see no point in sacking him now though. Anything short of a prelim this year should be putting his job under pressure immediately
I agree and it's part of why I think Mary will see out his contract. However, if we crash out this year and are poor next year, I expect he will not have his contract renewed by the club for 2020I do agree with you that he has to produce the goods at business end of the season. But remember this our financial situation is run by the NRL because of our debt. So if Mary was to go don’t think for a minute that we are going to get some high profile coach with a CV thicker than your arm. The NRL has the last say on what we spend whether we like it or not. Until we make substantial inroads into clearing our debt, nothing will change. It’s called financial management.