Too many assumptions. It's like a disease here. I have simply posted 4 names and you lot have done the rest, not me.
It was actually because of the religion discussion that I wrote 4 names.
SOL - I didn't allude to anything. Just posted 4 names.
millersnose - are the names I posted not white players? Of course white players get dumped.
DJDL - what bow? WHat did I say. I think you're drawing the bow for me
![Smile :) :)](/data/emoji/263a.png)
Naughty.
5harkies - as per SOL. I made no comment. Just 4 names and a line "take it where you want to"
The Popper - cop what?
Dread - did you see a pattern?
So the thing is this. I post 4 names and say take it where you want to and you all assume I am alluding to something. How? I made no qualifying statement or comment. I offered no opinion.
If I had put 4 of the other names down would you all of assumed I was alluding to some problem with whites? Doubtful, isn't it.
You know why don't you? Because like it or not the path you, the respondents, have taken is foremost in your minds. Why is that?
And just to be courteous to Dread who actually thought out a reply.
Treister - did his share of abusing people in public - the reason why he wasn't asked back even after Ando was punted. Also highlighted it with inappropriate, childish behaviour after a PL game.
Graham - was sadly out of form. Never recaptured it. So in hindisght he was past it and the decision was vindicated. He didn't "come back to bite" as the phrase here goes.
Mellor - Is leaving again for similar reasons. All this year he has been playing with injury at the behest of the coaching and training staff. So is he a sook or is the problem in the club with that one?