dallymessenger
Coach
- Messages
- 10,970
well, I guess it does prove nowdays that 'contracts' mean nothing and are no longer legal agreements.
Seriously mate, if you incur a career-ending injury, are not offered a media position in League and are made to work in the workforce, 5 days a week, 48 out of 52 weeks a year on $50,000/year, you'll be very grateful for all those years you were earning 6 digits.
:lol:
Who in their right mind would offer this bloke a position in media. Very little speaking skills and even less personality.
If all these guys want is $$$ then do we really want them? i'd prefer a player who plays with passion for the jersey.
also
Am i the only one who thinks SBW would be a total flop in union. His game doesn't suit the 15 a side game, Gas will kill it but i cant see Williams doing much, hasn't got the speed to be a back, doesn't have the size to be a forward.
also
I cant believe the NRL stops players endorsing products. The players would be able to cash in on their popularity and best of all the game would get free advertising every time a nike or reebok ad came on the tele. Sportsman like Kobe Bryant and ronaldinho have become household names around the globe and a large part of that is because nike keep shoving up billboards and making tv ads. Can you imagine if the NBA told kobe he wasnt allow to sign with nike. The NRL's stance on this is absurd.
well, I guess it does prove nowdays that 'contracts' mean nothing and are no longer legal agreements. Well, at least we won't have to hear about Sonny Bill incessantly whinging about how he isn't being paid enough money ($400,000/year). Seriously mate, if you incur a career-ending injury, are not offered a media position in League and are made to work in the workforce, 5 days a week, 48 out of 52 weeks a year on $50,000/year, you'll be very grateful for all those years you were earning 6 digits.
Tidus Raider said:There's arguments on both sides. Just look at the AFL. granted they are the only league in the world and their position is unique but you never hear player disdain for lack of money the players union are never at loggerheads with the league over pay. Why? beacuse there stars earn what they deserve and should be earning being high class athletes in australia.
I guarantee you Sydney Swans stars like Leo Barry and Adam Goodes earn more then most RL players in sydney, excluding third party payments.
The elite AFL players earn vastly more then the top RL players and thats a known fact.
My argument is that they earn what they deserve. They are content. I guarantee you if RL players could earn the same amount playing in the NRL as they do in SuperLeague then not one player would of gone over under the age of 28.
Players want to secure there future. RL careers these days last 7-8 years before there is a new kind on the block. 7-8 years to earn as much as you can before having to look in the workplace for a normal job.
Players want to secure there future. RL careers these days last 7-8 years before there is a new kind on the block. 7-8 years to earn as much as you can before having to look in the workplace for a normal job.
He is a 6'3, 108kg man that can run the 40 metre in 5 seconds flat. If you could name me one union player anywhere in the world who can match those stats i'd be very suprised.
And no, dunning rolling down a hill doesn't count.
I disagree.
They don't complain simply because they don't have another option. An AFL player isn't going to be offered more money to play it or a similar sport for more money like a Rugby League player can be.
It just simply can't happen.
But an AFL playeralso has the option to get his true earning potential as they don't have the same issue with 3rd party agreements in the cap like we do. Once that has changed in the NRL, we will see a lot more players not having to leave due to money.