Personally I think 1 game every year should be a "neutral" venue if possible. What kind of 3 game series gives one team a 2-1 home game advantage that hasn't been earned somehow?
Every year, 1 game should be put out to tender, with the best bid/offer getting the game, factoring in several other criteria as well as money.
If the interest was there to go down the path of games outside of Australia/NZ maybe limit it to once every 4 years. The concept could be a massive one for RL and it's fans.
5) Melbourne, Perth, Auckland, and Wellington make a lot more sense as neutral venues, since none of the above criticisms apply, and there is actually demand for a 2 state Australian/NRL match.
If it was going to be the UK, then Old Trafford would be a better bet. The best quality stadium located closest to the geographical heart of Rugby League.
Personally I'm not sure the game would draw enough interest to generate big ticket sales however.
Besides the actual English League fans and northerners, most English people have sparing knowledge of League and even the geography of Australia.
I agree with this. Also, it would be good in Port Moresby.
Was in London during origin a few years ago and headed to a pub to watch it, places was packed out with Aussie expats and backpackers. They'd have no problem filling Wembley, origin has become a stand alone elite sports product of its own strength now. Just not worth the travel involved I wouldn't think. Now Singapore at their new stadium might be a better bet. Lots of rich corporates in Singapore to get interested in NRL and less travel/time zone issue and Singapore Govt chucks many many millions at sports event for the place.
A prerequisite for a state of origin would be a stadium of at least 50k. Lang park itself is probably too small. Port Moresby's biggest ground has a capacity of 25k tops.
Was in London during origin a few years ago and headed to a pub to watch it, places was packed out with Aussie expats and backpackers. They'd have no problem filling Wembley, origin has become a stand alone elite sports product of its own strength now. Just not worth the travel involved I wouldn't think. Now Singapore at their new stadium might be a better bet. Lots of rich corporates in Singapore to get interested in NRL and less travel/time zone issue and Singapore Govt chucks many many millions at sports event for the place.
i dont think my bus goes past their...
Those pubs would be packed with backpackers if origin wasn't on. That's what you do when you are in England, go to the pub!!!
Yeah, I mean in future. When they have a bigger capacity.
I am just putting it on the map of to do places.
Can you build a 45k stadium cheaply? I am thinking seating like Notre Dame Stadium - one long slab around the ground no individually seats - plus no roof. Surely that can be built cheaply.
Mate, have you been to PNG? Based on what people I know who have, it will be a very long time before they have a football stadium in Port Moresby that can hold that many people. That have far more pressing issues to deal with let me assure you. Some parts of PNG are closer to the third world.
I think a few NRL games in PNG/Fiji/Samoa and Tonga at SOO time be better.A prerequisite for a state of origin would be a stadium of at least 50k. Lang park itself is probably too small. Port Moresby's biggest ground has a capacity of 25k tops.
I think a few NRL games in PNG/Fiji/Samoa and Tonga at SOO time be better.