He’s gone!
He’ll fight it and lose.
Melb will lose next week.
As long as Roosters don't win..= Win/Win
He’s gone!
He’ll fight it and lose.
Melb will lose next week.
As long as Roosters don't win..= Win/Win
Disagree to close to the sideline to be conclusive with a legal tackle. Further in field yeh..likely YESAs I was writing the Should Slater be suspended thread, I realised that Cronulla should have received a penalty try for Slater's shoulder charge and then a kick for goal under the post. What is the difference between a high tackle or a shoulder charge that prevents a try being scored. I am obviously thinking of us losing the GF due to a penalty try. If Slater didn't make any contact with the Cronulla winger, he obviously would have scored. Did any of the commentators even mention the possibility of a penalty try? Come to think of it Slater probably should have even been sin binned as well, for using foul play to prevent a try being scored.
Disagree to close to the sideline to be conclusive with a legal tackle. Further in field yeh..likely YES
But if Slater would have hit him high, like Ainscough did the Melbourne player in the 99 grand final, would it then have warranted a penalty try? What is the difference between a high tackle for a penalty try and a shoulder charge for a penalty try?Disagree to close to the sideline to be conclusive with a legal tackle. Further in field yeh..likely YES
If Slater gets let off it will be a massive black mark against the NRL and the game as a whole.Slater has been a very good but a dirty player all his life.
Justice would be him rubbed out of playing the GF.
Let’s see how genuine our law makers are.
Lol. As if the nrl will rub Slater out of GF. It would cost them too much money. There will be people watching the game just to see Billy's last game. If he doesn't play tv ratings will suffer.I
If Slater gets let off it will be a massive black mark against the NRL and the game as a whole.
Justice or Hypocracy !
Here's to you NRL.
No...but a penatly or sin bin sufficient.But if Slater would have hit him high, like Ainscough did the Melbourne player in the 99 grand final, would it then have warranted a penalty try? What is the difference between a high tackle for a penalty try and a shoulder charge for a penalty try?
I am yet to see another penalty try given for a head high tackle in all my time of following footy for 38 years.
Scared of the entity that runs the nrl- news ltdSlater charged grade 0ne and will miss the grand final.
Melbourne will fight charges and the nrl will let him off.
Why because they are weak and scared of melbourne .
Thats why
Does Murdock still own some of the Storm!Slater charged grade 0ne and will miss the grand final.
Melbourne will fight charges and the nrl will let him off.
Why because they are weak and scared of melbourne .
Thats why
Does Murdock still own some of the Storm!
CC
I
If Slater gets let off it will be a massive black mark against the NRL and the game as a whole.
Justice or Hypocracy !
Here's to you NRL.
And when Frizzell accidentally touched the referee he was suspended as it was " to the letter of the law "NRL: hold my beer!
And when Frizzell accidentally touched the referee he was suspended as it was " to the letter of the law "
Billy just keeps winning! Although GF Sunday might turn out otherwise !