simmos tackle on tate

[Mr Angry]

Millers you archivist you.

 

[Chondricthyes]

:lol:

that's cool, Ive never had my archive searched before....

I don't know whether i feel aroused or violated.... :shock:

Stick by all of those comments which were not made continually when the player ,or Coach(and as I've said its early and he has a lot to learn ) improved on them.

You forgot putting weights on Lomu and throwing him in Botany Bay- I hate blokes who don't try and until he puts in many games in a row busting HIS buns( he does have experience)- say hi to the oysters buddy.

 

[millersnose]

lol

just your first page was enough

so i take it, if you stand by your comments, that only your criticisms are valid?

 

[Chondricthyes]

lol

just your first page was enough

so i take it, if you stand by your comments, that only your criticisms are valid?

Not at all.

I stand by those comments but if i see improvement,ie Baily 's discipline has improved(he gets better the further he gets from rep honours-hmmm, head thing maybe?).
Stu -i have said IS improving but he is still learning.
Rieck -GGGOOONNNEEE-good luck to him but I can't stand blokes that don't try.
Merrit-have to wait till /if he gets seniors time.

My beef is with people who can't change or modify opinions when there is obvious improvement or change..... especially with very young blokes(these blokes can't have kids- you know change is inevitable with the young, so you do tend to back off a bit and wait and see).
It doesn't mean you can't criticise- but bad is bad and good is good-
development/improvment comes from recognising and acknowledging both.

but it all makes for good debate