What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Smith slams 'unfair' scheduling

Bicey_18

Bench
Messages
3,021
Smith slams 'unfair' scheduling

By Todd Balym
May 18, 2008
NEWCASTLE coach Brian Smith has labelled the NRL "not a fair competition" because of the lack of flexibility in game scheduling.
Smith has been on a long crusade against the NRL over its scheduling around the representative time of the season, and he continued it following his side's 38-26 loss to Wests Tigers at EnergyAustralia Stadium.
The Knights were backing up from an intense and narrow away loss to Melbourne last Monday, and they were without Origin stars Danny Buderus and Ben Cross plus the injured Kurt Gidley.
The Tigers meanwhile were almost at full-strength, only prop Todd Payten missing with injury, and they had too much class for the Knights, who appeared to struggle with fatigue midway through the second half.
Smith said he felt for teams such as Brisbane and Melbourne, who both suffered weekend defeats to drop three places on the table because they were without their best players.
"How can you possibly expect Melbourne to take their best nine players out and win?"' said Smith.
"It's just ludicrous. You may as well say on that weekend we will give (their opposition) the points.
"Brisbane has been doing it for donkey's years, and other clubs have it from time to time.
"It's just we have all got to understand the NRL is not a fair competition.
"There's other things that are not fair. You play at times when you get Monday night games away week after week, and get backed up with injuries.
"You don't play everyone twice. Sometimes you get to play teams that are no good, or not as good as the others twice, and the other ones once.
It's Russian roulette and you just have to do your best."
Smith believes a lot of the problems can be solved if the NRL puts State of Origin on a stand-alone weekend, as the AFL did with its Hall of Fame tribute match, meaning that players will not have to miss clubs games.
"Until Channel Nine or somebody decided that State of Origin would be a better ratings winner for them on Sunday afternoon, it's not going to change," he said.
"It's a bit of a futile argument and something the chief executives and people at the top of the pile should be dealing with if they feel like it's worth dealing with."
Former NSW and Newcastle forward Steve Simpson said a weekend Origin would be warmly accepted by the players.
"As a stand-alone, it would get a lot of support from the players because you would get a full week between games and you would probably not be quite as worn out come the back end of the year," Simpson said.



www.foxsports.com.au
 

K-Man

Bench
Messages
3,171
Thanks Smithy.

Couldn't have picked a better time for you to chime in after my thread on this exact subject.

The whole situation is highly unfair.
 

reginald.p

Juniors
Messages
208
This season is really starting to piss me off. We play Brisbane and Melbourne twice when they have their rep players, then we play the easier tigers and Bulldogs only once without our rep players but they are at full strength. If the NRL insist on making us play Brisbane and Melbourne twice then they should at least schedule those games in the rep period so we don't get completely screwed over like we did this year.
 

Nuffy

Bench
Messages
4,075
He's right but the NRL have their heads in the sand on this issue.

This period will make or break some of the lesser team such as us. Teams like the Storm will drop some and then roll on after the rep season.

Teams like to Dragons get to play 2nd rate teams and rack up easy points. We however get to lose the best players we have and then face full strength teams such as the Tigers.

Not exactly a equitable system
 

Kazaf

Juniors
Messages
677
Just out of curiousity, would it be any better/worse if the SOO series were to be held after the season?

Would be good if all rep games were held after the normal NRL season, no interuptions, let the best players do what they do best without any other responsibilities and duties.
 

Hanscholo

Bench
Messages
4,818
Welcome to Newcastle Brian. We could be finishing last every year and still manage to lose 3 or 4 of our best players to rep teams 4 times a year.

I wouldnt go so far as to slam the system, but id love to know why our byes have been so badly scheduled this season.

The NRL seem to forget that we supply a lot of Country players by default, and from that a lot of SOO players. It has been unfair for a long time, not just this season. Players seem to get picked when they are playing for the knights, i have no reason for it, it just seems to be the case. Take Ben Cross for instance, has two fantastic seasons for the storm, moves to newcastle and is an auto inclusion in the side. Take a side like the tigers, they have a heap of fringe SOO players, and they dont seem to get picked. I bet my left nut that if Farah and Collis played for Newcastle they'd be in this years side.

One wonders why we would even bother to develop players anymore. They are away at the beck and call of the NRL, and what do we get for our trouble? They get a 100k more offered to them from England and we lose em.
 

Hanscholo

Bench
Messages
4,818
Just out of curiousity, would it be any better/worse if the SOO series were to be held after the season?

Would be good if all rep games were held after the normal NRL season, no interuptions, let the best players do what they do best without any other responsibilities and duties.

Imo the only solution to rep games is for there to be a week off for all teams. Play the test matches and country games out of season. Split rounds dont work because they arent able to be changed at the last minute to suite teams and even if they were there would still be sides crying foul about being disadvantaged. If the SOO was on this weekend at ANZ and it was the only match in town it would have been sold out months ago.
 

Big Tim

First Grade
Messages
6,500
What I cant understand is that we had 3 short rounds for the CvC and Test match, but a full round leading into SOO.

IMO Origin would be just as successful on a Friday night or a Sunday afternoon.

The game as a stand alone would force people to watch to get their "fix".
 

Big Tim

First Grade
Messages
6,500
To add to the above, if it were a stand alone game, you might see better "opposition" Origin crowds in attendance...

I know I couldnt attend an Origin game in Melb or Bris even if I wanted to.
 

Latest posts

Top