What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

SOO 2016 game 2

Noise

Coach
Messages
18,191
So again our halves offer nothing in attack. And Moylan offers nothing. Like game 1 we have no points in us
 

Wally21

Bench
Messages
4,427
I have noproblem with them playing on ... but technically i think if youmregain possession it should stop ... had he been juggling it then different story, but he did regain it .... i guess cos he passed straight away i would say play on

It should have been called a double knock on. Then it should have been looked at for Cronk holding Frizelle back in the chase. Fittler (who never usually says anything worth quoting) got it right when he said that its different rules for them. They would have looked at it 40 times if it was NSW and taken it off us.
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,988
When you look at the possession queensland should be much more than 1 lucky try against the play infront

The problem is, nsw dont seem to have a game breaker
 

Noise

Coach
Messages
18,191
It should have been called a double knock on. Then it should have been looked at for Cronk holding Frizelle back in the chase. Fittler (who never usually says anything worth quoting) got it right when he said that its different rules for them. They would have looked at it 40 times if it was NSW and taken it off us.

Didn't it come off the qlders back after Jennings knocked it on? You can't call a double knock on unless it hit the qlders arm.
 
Messages
19,393
Not when Jennings regains it, and then passes it

"The Referee is the sole judge of what constitutes an advantage
be it tactical or territorial. An infringement is not ?negated? simply
because the ball touches or is touched by an opponent."

I didn't watch that part of the play too closely. You might be right. But that wasn't a bad call. Plenty of others were, though.
 

Noise

Coach
Messages
18,191
When you look at the possession queensland should be much more than 1 lucky try against the play infront

The problem is, nsw dont seem to have a game breaker

It's a shame a game breaker like Tedesco and Cartwright aren't from NSW :crazy:
 

Noise

Coach
Messages
18,191
"The Referee is the sole judge of what constitutes an advantage
be it tactical or territorial. An infringement is not ?negated? simply
because the ball touches or is touched by an opponent."

I didn't watch that part of the play too closely. You might be right. But that wasn't a bad call. Plenty of others were, though.

Agreed. It was the right call.
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,988
Id like to see jack bird get a good run ... he's a strong ball runner and i reckon he could make something happen ... if daley doesnt give him some decent minutes early in the 2nd half then laurie can go f**k himself
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,988
"The Referee is the sole judge of what constitutes an advantage
be it tactical or territorial. An infringement is not ?negated? simply
because the ball touches or is touched by an opponent."

I didn't watch that part of the play too closely. You might be right. But that wasn't a bad call. Plenty of others were, though.

Shut up barry!
 

Latest posts

Top