redVgirl said:
i meant that queensland won the game. so the bad decisions didnt affect the OUTCOME. not the scoreline. this isnt the NRL comp so for and against isnt a factor. the end result is whats important. and the bad reffing, and i agree that it was bad....it doesnt affect the outcome of the game.
seriously if maroons fans are still whinging when they win...lordddy.
You cockroaches are sure holding your own in the whinging stakes... despite the fact that all the good decisions went your way!
Other examples: Tate gets penalised early on for a forearm in the tackle. Fair call. Nathan Hindmarsh proceeds to drop forearms and grapple in every tackle he makes, yet is never once called.
Example two: Thurston gets called for a flop. Again, I have no problem with this. What I do have a problem with is the fact that NSW and also Queensland to a lesser extent were then allowed to flop in at will much later than Thurston got penalised for. Where's the consistency?
In the end, you have a great game which is spoiled by a horrible refereeing performance. The sad fact is that that is what this match will be remembered for. So while it didn't in the end affect the result and the best team won, it is still a massive blight on the game and one that must soon be rectified.
