What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Storm Lineup 4 Knights

Messages
381
Hey guys just heard the Storm Team what u guys think?

1.Billy Slater
2.Matt Geyer
3.Matt King
4.Ben MacDougall
5.Fifita Moala
6.Scott Hill
7.Matt Orford (doubtful)
8.Robbie Kearns
9.Cameron Smith
10.Rodney Howe
11.Peter Robinson
12.Stephen Kearney (c)
13.David Kidwell
Bench
14. Kirk Reynoldson
15. Danny Williams
16. Alex Chan
17. Glen Turner

Personally I still think we can beat them
 

~knights~

Juniors
Messages
2,214
If Orford doesn't play then Andrew Mcfadden (brisbane nths) is on standby.

Yes I think we can win.

All we need is the same intensity in defense as last week.

Rush off our line in numbers and make them pay.Drive them backwards.

The Roosters have been doing it for a couple of years now,and as joey said in his column......"we are rooster clones" :lol:

Our attack is as good as any .

I have a good feel about this year 8)
 

astrogirl

First Grade
Messages
7,320
The team list tells me there were some player movements that I wasn't aware of, for instance Ben MacDougall, David Kidwell and Alex Chan.

To be honest I'm not sure how this line up will go as I don't know much about the players.
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
Astro Girl David Kidwell was signed too the Storm at the end of the 2002 season.

And I would be interested to see the source from wheree this was obtained?

This is by no means our strongest line-up.

Matt Orford is a 95% chance of playing so the words doubtful may be removed from the brakets.

Steve Turner is missing and Matt Geyer is wasted on the wing.

i would not be at all suprised if that was not the team that runs out this weekend.
 

astrogirl

First Grade
Messages
7,320
Earl said:
Astro Girl David Kidwell was signed too the Storm at the end of the 2002 season.
LOL at myself :lol: obviously I didn't pay that much attention to the Roosters or the Storm last year!
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
I just found the team and it was infact correct.

Although Turner and Nathan Friend were named as 18 and 19.

I must say I'm fairly dissapointed by the team thats been named, but hopefully Bellamey knows best :lol:
 

Jedda

Juniors
Messages
1,776
Surely Hill would now be better suited at Lock and leave Geyer (who appears to have been wasted on the wing all these years) in the 5/8 position.

With Hill spending a large part of last season gathering splinters in his butt on the sideline, Geyer and Orford had the chance to build a half decent combination.

Regardless of being a Knights supporter, i'd still put my money on the Knights solely for the fact that we've already played this season and have had the chance to put the early season jitters behind us.
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
Bellamy has named Steve Turner in the 19 man squad, and going on last year late changes seem to be the norm.

So I wouldn't be suprised to see Geyer play 5/8 and Hill at lock
 

Andy

First Grade
Messages
5,048
I heard Bellamy was planning to run on himself.

I wouldn't rule him out at this stage. :lol:
 

Latest posts

Top