What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Sunday Telegraph/Sun Hearald

Which do you profer when it comes to it's league section

  • Sun herald

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sunday Telegraph

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

strong_latte

Juniors
Messages
1,665
Broncodroid said:
The Telegraph were able to match SMH when they had Chippy Frilingos on board doing what he had been doing for the best part of 40 years...

Now, going into season 2005, Paul Kent, Dean Ritchie and Rebecca Wilson head their League department. Hmm...why is it I only look forward to reading anything from Andrew Johns in that paper :roll:

The SMH IMO is the more insightful paper and provides the best coverage throughout the season. The Telegraph's main focus is their 'childlike' obsession with rubbishing anything from Phil Gould whereas the SMH will report the game with as little gossip BS as possible.

The SMH is an easy winner.

That is exactly what I mean! Although they have a large section on league, generally the commentary is utter rubbish... The herald is far more objective and insightful in what they write, even if there isn't neccessarily as much of it.
 

strong_latte

Juniors
Messages
1,665
You must really passionately believe that to have posted it 3 times... Even if you like the sport section though, the fact remains that the tele is about as reliable for news as fox in the US...
 

innsaneink

Referee
Messages
29,384
dodge said:
Broncodroid said:
The Telegraph were able to match SMH when they had Chippy Frilingos on board doing what he had been doing for the best part of 40 years...

Now, going into season 2005, Paul Kent, Dean Ritchie and Rebecca Wilson head their League department. Hmm...why is it I only look forward to reading anything from Andrew Johns in that paper :roll:

The SMH IMO is the more insightful paper and provides the best coverage throughout the season. The Telegraph's main focus is their 'childlike' obsession with rubbishing anything from Phil Gould whereas the SMH will report the game with as little gossip BS as possible.

The SMH is an easy winner.

Yeah, um ok. Sure.

I've seen 2 Gould articles this year. One about his Origin antics and yesterdays sympathising overhis heart condition.

You're a toss.

And furthermore he was referring to the Sunday papers SH and ST, not SMH and DT

LOL.....they are the same papers ..... just Sunday versions. :roll:



Yet again you need correcting. :lol:
 

bartman

Immortal
Messages
41,022
I expect more from the (Sun) Tele, given it's owned by the mob that run 50% of our game. Considering that it disappoints, so Sun Herald gets my vote.

Generally I think Sunday papers are crap, but the general news reporting in the weekday SMH eats the Daily Terror.
 

Broncodroid

Juniors
Messages
2,313
dodge said:
Broncodroid said:
The Telegraph were able to match SMH when they had Chippy Frilingos on board doing what he had been doing for the best part of 40 years...

Now, going into season 2005, Paul Kent, Dean Ritchie and Rebecca Wilson head their League department. Hmm...why is it I only look forward to reading anything from Andrew Johns in that paper :roll:

The SMH IMO is the more insightful paper and provides the best coverage throughout the season. The Telegraph's main focus is their 'childlike' obsession with rubbishing anything from Phil Gould whereas the SMH will report the game with as little gossip BS as possible.

The SMH is an easy winner.

Yeah, um ok. Sure.

I've seen 2 Gould articles this year. One about his Origin antics and yesterdays sympathising overhis heart condition.

You're a toss.

And furthermore he was referring to the Sunday papers SH and ST, not SMH and DT

The biggest moron on this site dares to put forward an opinion that he/she thinks I am interested in... :roll:

I am a toss ?..No my friend, I provide you with intelligent debate you cannot handle in which you lower yourself to name calling...how about you move onto something else little man, most on this site have no time for your BS opinion.
 

iggy plop

First Grade
Messages
5,293
Herald Sun is the best, but with that Jac Magney women doing the gossip section from now on, league will get hammered.

That women has it in for the game big time.

Danny Weilder was much better.
 

gunnamatta bay

Referee
Messages
21,084
strong_latte said:
Gunna Matter said:
The Herald tries hard to ignore league but they can't afford to. Poor old Peter Fitzsimmons does his best to push the union barrow with his constant anti league stories. He was at it again with a story in Saturdays NZ Herald knocking the league tri nations.

Yeah? Do you have the link? f**k that bloke is the biggest tool! He needs to shut up, seriously.

Here it is. He really gets going about halfway.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sports/sp...n=rugbyleague&thesecondsubsection=general

Peter Fitzsimons: League's saviour out surfing Bondi

16.10.2004
COMMENT
In May of 1992, I was on the team bus heading for the third test between the All Blacks and the World XV in the Centenary Series. Named as a reserve for the World side, I remember wanting to quietly concentrate so I could send out secret but very powerful INJURY RAYS to Troy Coker's dodgy ankle, so I could get a game. Next to me, the World XV's lock Gary Whetton was in the mood to chat.
So, he said, "How do you think Manly is going to go in this year's comp?"
You mean, the Manly rugby club in the Sydney comp?
No, he meant the Manly Sea-Eagles, in the Winfield Cup.
That was the first time I had a clue just what level of following league had in New Zealand, strong enough that it stayed with me even through the shock of my injury rays missing Coker's ankle completely, and during the game tragically wiping out Willie Ofahengaue's knee. (Sorry about that, Willie.)
The point was that when a distinguished former All Black captain can give a bugger how an Australian league team was going to fare, then the 13-man game was clearly making a huge amount of headway in the Land of the Long White Cloud.
And, of course, I have noted the same phenomenon since. I remember not long afterwards, when your former Prime Minister David Lange came out in the press saying league was a much better game and much more honest because it was openly professional, when union was only "shamateur". A week later I remember doing a television debate on that subject with Lange on Boots N All - and him wiping the floor with me by the strength of his intellect, rather than the correctness of his case. I recall well when the Warriors made their debut, with the team emerging on the field through a flurry of fireworks and Pacific Islands drumming. I even remember that brief flicker when they weren't merely a hole in Eric Watson's back pocket, but a serious force in the NRL.
And of course, I will remember what happens tonight in the test between Australia and New Zealand for at least two days, maybe even three.
For whatever headway the NRL has made, the reality is that league internationally simply makes no impact, and it is a long time since it ever has done.
Oh sure, I know what you league fans are thinking, that arrogant Aussie blowhard FitzSimons is just saying that because he's a toffee-nosed rah-rah, who wouldn't know the first thing about league. Well you are dead wrong. As a matter of fact I have played two games of league (occasioning two trips to the hospital, but that's another story). And the former coach of the St George Dragons, Roy Masters, even came on a scouting expedition to judge my form when I was playing for Sydney University (although I should note that he left before halftime).
Look, it ain't rugby union hubris to note that international league is never going to be much chop when the game is restricted to being played essentially on the east coast of Australia, the north of England, various spots in New Zealand, scattered parts of New Guinea and France - and one nation is clearly dominant. (Australia, seeing as you ask.)
Sadly the only way out of this is for New Zealand and Great Britain, as well as other countries, to lift their standards to make such tests a genuine contest, and that is precisely what Australian coach Wayne Bennett was referring to, when he said this week: "To make the [test against New Zealand] a raging success I suppose everyone would like to see us get beaten because that's obviously the common cry you get." The problem is that we continually win.
The way around that problem?
One way would be for league to acknowledge the bleeding obvious and ensure that when players such as Tonie Carroll and Richard Villasanti come along, blokes who could play for either New Zealand or Australia, they should turn out for the country that needs them most, which is New Zealand. Of course the desires of the players have to be taken into account, but when Carroll has already played for New Zealand, it is amazing that the authorities from both countries wouldn't be on bended knee begging him to stay with you. He should be with you, and if that still doesn't make it an even contest, next time we'll get all our blokes to wear an eye-patch on at least one eye, and even say that if you live anywhere near Bondi, you're considered an honorary New Zealander.
* Rugby writer Peter FitzSimons is a former Wallaby
*
 

innsaneink

Referee
Messages
29,384
iggy plop said:
Herald Sun is the best, but with that Jac Magney women doing the gossip section from now on, league will get hammered.

That women has it in for the game big time.

Danny Weilder was much better.


Apparently her Benji story last week caused a slight stir and yesterday she printed something of a retraction or a reason why Benji was at the Roosters mad Monday....didnt take her long to back down.
 

JK

Guest
Messages
5,549
innsaneink said:
iggy plop said:
Herald Sun is the best, but with that Jac Magney women doing the gossip section from now on, league will get hammered.

That women has it in for the game big time.

Danny Weilder was much better.


Apparently her Benji story last week caused a slight stir and yesterday she printed something of a retraction or a reason why Benji was at the Roosters mad Monday....didnt take her long to back down.

When I saw she took Wielders spot I started swearing and a brief look at her page tells me I should treat it with the same respect as I treat Wilson's page. :evil:
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
101,049
Broncodroid said:
dodge said:
Broncodroid said:
The Telegraph were able to match SMH when they had Chippy Frilingos on board doing what he had been doing for the best part of 40 years...

Now, going into season 2005, Paul Kent, Dean Ritchie and Rebecca Wilson head their League department. Hmm...why is it I only look forward to reading anything from Andrew Johns in that paper :roll:

The SMH IMO is the more insightful paper and provides the best coverage throughout the season. The Telegraph's main focus is their 'childlike' obsession with rubbishing anything from Phil Gould whereas the SMH will report the game with as little gossip BS as possible.

The SMH is an easy winner.

Yeah, um ok. Sure.

I've seen 2 Gould articles this year. One about his Origin antics and yesterdays sympathising overhis heart condition.

You're a toss.

And furthermore he was referring to the Sunday papers SH and ST, not SMH and DT

The biggest moron on this site dares to put forward an opinion that he/she thinks I am interested in... :roll:

I am a toss ?..No my friend, I provide you with intelligent debate you cannot handle in which you lower yourself to name calling...how about you move onto something else little man, most on this site have no time for your BS opinion.


So your opinion precedes and overrides everyone elses? Is there some conspiracy going on via PM right around the site that I don;t know about where I'm the most hated poster? Get over the personal attacks and I will.

IMO, the Sunday Telegraph (the original question was not asked about the weekday edition Ink, so no, they aren't referring to the same paper. The Question would've been broadened to News or Fairax NSW papers if that answer was wanted) is better, they usually have better coverage on Sundays of the Saturday games, a lot of the time the SH doesn't manage to have scores from Sat night games until the Arvo edition. While Ms Wilson is a stupid &^*%&$, I much more look forward to reading the ST. When it comes to Wilson vs Gould, it comes down to the fact that Gould is a Rooster booster and SH do their best to rubbish league.

By the way, why are you at liberty to tell me when I can and cannot share my so-called BS opinion? I'll share my f**king opinion until the cows come home and if you don't like it you can shove it. I don't see the word Moderator under your name so don't go around acting like one. This isn't the only thread you've done it in.
 

Broncodroid

Juniors
Messages
2,313
="dodge"]Get over the personal attacks and I will.

Just so we are clear dodge...you wanted to call me "a toss", you threw the first punch forum wise if I am not mistaken for sharing my opinion. Dry your eye's princess.

dodge said:
By the way, why are you at liberty to tell me when I can and cannot share my so-called BS opinion? I'll share my f***ing opinion until the cows come home and if you don't like it you can shove it. I don't see the word Moderator under your name so don't go around acting like one. This isn't the only thread you've done it in.

:clap: Brilliant tough guy response :clap: For the record, I did not 'tell you when you could or couldn't share your BS opinion", that would be ludicrous...I merely informed you I have no time for yours. Express your opinion as I in turn will.

If you have a problem with myself and my posting style, PM Admin champ. Dismissing me as a "toss" then attempting to look the good guy out of this I trust will get you nowhere.

Good day to you ;-)
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
101,049
Broncodroid said:
="dodge"]Get over the personal attacks and I will.

Just so we are clear dodge...you wanted to call me "a toss", you threw the first punch forum wise if I am not mistaken for sharing my opinion. Dry your eye's princess.

dodge said:
By the way, why are you at liberty to tell me when I can and cannot share my so-called BS opinion? I'll share my f***ing opinion until the cows come home and if you don't like it you can shove it. I don't see the word Moderator under your name so don't go around acting like one. This isn't the only thread you've done it in.

:clap: Brilliant tough guy response :clap: For the record, I did not 'tell you when you could or couldn't share your BS opinion", that would be ludicrous...I merely informed you I have no time for yours. Express your opinion as I in turn will.

If you have a problem with myself and my posting style, PM Admin champ. Dismissing me as a "toss" then attempting to look the good guy out of this I trust will get you nowhere.

Good day to you ;-)

You'll take the high road...

:roll: For the record, "mate," re-read your post. You didn't say you had no time for my opinion, you tried to tell me that most of the site believed the same (obviously running off Ink's fine assessment of the situation). I do have a problem with you and I have also seen more than one other complain about you continuously acting as if you are a moderator. It's clear to me you're the one trying to come off as the good guy here.
 

strong_latte

Juniors
Messages
1,665
dodge said:
When it comes to Wilson vs Gould, it comes down to the fact that Gould is a Rooster booster and SH do their best to rubbish league.

I don't really like Gould either (and I'm a rooster), but Roy Masters, Sterlo and Greg's opinions are always very interesting to read... usually much more insightful than the tele in my opinion, which tends to not really have much informed opinion apart from the odd article from andrew johns... Also, I'm just qurious as to how you came of the opinion that the SMH rubbish's league? Apart from Fitsimons (who is generally a shit stirrer when it comes to league in any forum) I seriously can't figure out what your referring to... they have roughly equal coverage of both union and league depending on the time of year, and it's not like the tele play union down either, they have massive sections on the S12 and internationals when they're on...
 
Top