I'm intrigued that nobody wants to discuss my earlier post on this subject in any detail:
The Dawson Twins Minus 1 said:
The Supporters Club (good people one and all) voted to dissolve itself a few years back to keep from dividing the club / supporters' efforts.
Some of the folks got more active with the running of the club / game day work, others limited their involvement to flying the Jets flag at home and away games.
I would say a seperate entity isn't needed. Maybe all it would take is just an avid supporter to act as a designated liason person - working with the club and organising the fan activities / transport /seating etc. for home and especially away game days.
I agree with Jeffles - trust me - no-one who didn't have to would want to sit through an entire Jets board meeting.
I feel a completely "Independant" supporters club would be of dubious value because it would by its very nature be disconnected from the realities of running the club.
This will doubtless cause problems in the long term. Why? Because all it would take to create a major division within the club is for a few characters to have a bee in their bonnet about things that are impracticable for financial or manpower reasons.
I can recall in the days of the previous Supporters' organisation that there were some pretty vehement hatreds floating round about individual officials from the SG folks simply because one of their pet projects hadn't been greenlighted.
When I checked out the facts, I found out they'd been told the realities of the matter, but it didn't stop them from making up their own version for propagation among their fellows.
Wouldn't it be better if such things were dealt with directly and in the open? Say in a regular "Fan's Forum" with club officials in attendance?
Then, if somebody wanted to push a particular gripe, they would have to submit their ideas before the meeting and then stand up in front of everyone and present their proposals in an intelligent and properly thought-out format.
Then, if it was proved not to be workable, they'd have to accept the referee's decision and avoid further silly rancour.
You say:
Henson Park Hornets said:
I'm not 100% keen on the idea that if you are a member of JISM then you have to be a member of the football club,
I can't understand why anyone in their vaguely right mind would want to be a member of JISM WITHOUT being also prepared to stump up the minimal figure for Jets membership anyway.
The last time I renewed my membership, it cost a trifling sum. Further, I would tend to suspect the motivations of anyone who claimed to be an active Jets fan and was unprepared to pay even that miniscule figure in support of the Jets.
You also said:
Henson Park Hornets said:
the main reason why I thought that the JISM would be a good idea was that it would be indepenant from the running of the club but could let the people who run the club know what the fans want and supply feedback about the running of the club.
I can't really see why independence is needed to make fans' concerns any more valid or valued by the club. The "Independent Supporters' Association" concept first arose in England because of club administrations that absolutely refused to communicate with members or take account of their concerns. You may disagree, but I don't believe Newtown fits that description.
Lastly:
Henson Park Hornets said:
Not sure if that would be a problem if a member from JISM attended a board meeting but wasn't actaully a board member?
It's happened a number of times before to my knowledge, but I should imagine it would be more useful if it was done in an organised regular "supporters' representative" format rather than on an ad-hoc basis. Contrary to popular belief, Newtown board meetings are mostly just sit-downs where the (rather heavy) workload gets divvied up between the attendees.
Please forgive me for suspecting that an Independent Supporters Movement's elected executive could easily end up having all the self-importance of a real club board without any of the responsibility or accountability.
I suppose I could sum up my viewpoint by saying I'd rather have as many as possible of the Jets faithful "inside the tent pissing out (on our enemies) than outside pissing in" - as the saying goes.
I repeat - we're far too small a club to profit by willingly dividing ourselves.