Soren Lorenson
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,482
Well judging from their forum, no.They have fans?
Well judging from their forum, no.They have fans?
If they were unstoppable, by definition they wouldn’t be a back up.SO WE ARE MISSING THE UNDROPPABLE PERFECT BACK UP HALF FFS!!!
Backflip
Well he’s not Unbaldable.If they were unstoppable, by definition they wouldn’t be a back up.
I assume you are talking about Rankin?
I googled "NRL nuffy, insomnia" and it came up with nothing.This was your chance to hit me with one of those backflip gifs you've been keeping up your sleeve.
I disagree with the merkin all the time.You and Noise need to get to an agreement on this and get back to us
Cartwright is absolutely not a centre. He lacks the lateral movement for defence. You go on about disrupting the halves but our problem after Russell left the field was our defence. Cartwright at centre would be a huge vulnerability. Even defending three in he's a liability.He couldn’t have covered centre last week (however poorly received)? Would have saved us the trouble of having to shift Brown to centre and disrupting our attack. It still would have been the better option even if we didn’t need the cover for edge forward like we do this week.
It skips a generation they say.Well he’s not Unbaldable.
Is this a postmodern haiku?Ready to owned bitches?
Bald men cup.
Ours , so shyte is your team.
Dog balls you suck.
I googled "NRL nuffy, insomnia" and it came up with nothing.
Just giving Shyte.Is this a postmodern haiku?
Banter is one thing, but that is disgusting.Perhaps Auto spell kicked in and children GIFS come up due to your history of searches.
f**king rabbit
Banter is one thing, but that is disgusting.
Not in this case, maybe Matthew is still a hope??It skips a generation they say.
How many bald hookers have you seen or is that question a tad personal?Not in this case, maybe Matthew is still a hope??
Too manyHow many bald hookers have you seen or is that question a tad personal?