Teams score what is safe against others

[Gaba]

I been looking through all teams attack and this is what i think other teams will need to score be enough to win

Cronulla, - Teams who score 14 or over should be enough for a win against the sharks

Roosters,eels,panthers,bulldogs, - 16-20 big chance of win , 21 or more will win

Souths,titans,cowboys - 18-22 big chance or 23 or more will win

Tigers,canberra,knights ,warriors- 20 or more should be enough



Dragons - 20-24 chance ,25 or over should be enough

Storm,manly,broncos - same as dragons

 

[Geohood]

50 would be a safe bet to beat all teams

 

[Gaba]

50 would be a safe bet to beat all teams

Sharks,bulldogs,eels, maybe panthers
wont have the attack to get over 20 alone 50

 

[Geohood]

If they're vsing Souths they'd have a chance

 

[Gaba]

Lol

 

[Ausguy]

cronulla scored more than 14 points 17 times out of 24 last year.
also 11/24 times the opposition didnt score 15+ points.
so im not sure what your thoughts are based on.

It is interesteing to note though that you have put the bulldogs (the spponers) further up the ladder in point scoring ability than cronulla given the hand break is now steering the dogs ship.

interesting none the less, time will tell.

 

[Shorty]

Dragons - 20-24 chance ,25 or over should be enough

Storm,manly,broncos - same as dragons

:lol:
I just love how you put the Dragons up there with the Broncos and Storm.
Ah you're a funny poster.

 

[Gaba]

:lol:
I just love how you put the Dragons up there with the Broncos and Storm.
Ah you're a funny poster.

Ok i was a bit bias , but still i think a team needs more then 20 points though

 

[Ausguy]

wayne bennet has the weight of the world on those scrawny shoulders over there at kogarah doesnt he.... hope he can handle the heat if it turns to sh*t.

 

[Bobby DIGital]

30 for the Raiders IMO. Our superior, next level attack will just keep coming non-stop until the 80th minute.

 

[Dogs Of War]

cronulla scored more than 14 points 17 times out of 24 last year.
also 11/24 times the opposition didnt score 15+ points.
so im not sure what your thoughts are based on.

It is interesteing to note though that you have put the bulldogs (the spponers) further up the ladder in point scoring ability than cronulla given the hand break is now steering the dogs ship.

interesting none the less, time will tell.

That's the same hand brake that you are saying helped Cronulla score more than 14 points 17 out of 24 times last year.

 

[Loudstrat]

Sharks,bulldogs,eels, maybe panthers
wont have the attack to get over 20 alone 50

lol. Score 20 against the Eels and Panthers and knock off = loss.

 

[oneeyedeaglesman]

30 for the Raiders IMO. Our superior, next level attack will just keep coming non-stop until the 80th minute.

Possibly in Canberra,would need to be down to 12 men though to need 30.:sarcasm:

 

[mxlegend99]

Scoring 20 against the Panthers might get you a win one week, but the following week it could put you on the wrong end of a massive flogging. The same applies to every team in the NRL.

There is no safe score (aside from ridiculously high ones ofcourse) to beat any team. Sharks were the worst attacking team in the NRL last year but still managed to finish equal first with Storm and Manly because they defended so well they could win games with 2 or 3 tries.

 

[Ausguy]

That's the same hand brake that you are saying helped Cronulla score more than 14 points 17 out of 24 times last year.

No he didnt help. Trust me. You will get frustrated watching him kill an overlap over n over again. The only good thing he does is kick chase.... im personally glad he is gone.

 

[_Johnsy]

ahhhhh gaba strikes again.

 

[big boppa eel]

I been looking through all teams attack and this is what i think other teams will need to score be enough to win

Cronulla, - Teams who score 14 or over should be enough for a win against the sharks

Roosters,eels,panthers,bulldogs, - 16-20 big chance of win , 21 or more will win

Souths,titans,cowboys - 18-22 big chance or 23 or more will win

Tigers,canberra,knights ,warriors- 20 or more should be enough



Dragons - 20-24 chance ,25 or over should be enough

Storm,manly,broncos - same as dragons

I love the way you keep death riding Parra you poor clown, lets see throughout 09 how they go especially against the new "Premiership Contenders" the Dragons, talk about rose coloured glasses. :sarcasm:

 

[Southern Rooster]

cronulla scored more than 14 points 17 times out of 24 last year.
also 11/24 times the opposition didnt score 15+ points.
so im not sure what your thoughts are based on.

It is interesteing to note though that you have put the bulldogs (the spponers) further up the ladder in point scoring ability than cronulla given the hand break is now steering the dogs ship.

interesting none the less, time will tell.

The Roosters and the Dogs shared the honour last year of having the most scoreless halves. 14.

The Roosters also played in the games where there were completely scoreless halves. There attack was not much chop but they defended well. If they keep that defense up and improve in attack. They will be hard to beat this year.

 

[Non Terminator]

I been looking through all teams attack and this is what i think other teams will need to score be enough to win

Cronulla, - Teams who score 14 or over should be enough for a win against the sharks

Roosters,eels,panthers,bulldogs, - 16-20 big chance of win , 21 or more will win

Souths,titans,cowboys - 18-22 big chance or 23 or more will win

Tigers,canberra,knights ,warriors- 20 or more should be enough



Dragons - 20-24 chance ,25 or over should be enough

Storm,manly,broncos - same as dragons

We got 10 in the last round against you and that was enough. :lol:
Seriously, defence means nothing though?