What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

That Call

KeepingTheFaith

Referee
Messages
25,235
Embarrassing example of how badly the rules have become f**ked up by the morons who continually tweak them every season.

Technically you can argue that's a try, but anyone who has been watching league for more than 2-3 years knows that's not a try regardless of what technicality they can find and the fact that its gotten to the stage that a referee can actually find a reason to award that is embarrassing.
 

user_nat

Coach
Messages
12,411
You can't kick at the ball to stop a try and if you do it anywhere else on the field it's considered playing at the ball.

Seems fine to me.

The only possible grey area is if he knocked it on after regathering from the kick. Although I guess it would either be 6 again or penalty try.
 

NrlCoach

Juniors
Messages
1,730
403468_441951245834652_100000593401911_1637719_575910779_n.jpg
 

The Joker

Juniors
Messages
1,478
If I was a neutral fan than I would say that it was a no try. As a Queenslander I would say it was a try and the bitterness of Blues fans is someone I wouldn't mind putting on some battered fish and chips. At worst the series is going to be 2-1 to Queensland.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,399
Was a clear PENALTY TRY...no idea what the whinging is for. Try to tackle him rather than kicking Inglis!
 

LESStar58

Referee
Messages
25,496
If Slater had led into a tackle with his legs like that you New South Welshman would be calling for his head.

This.

They changed the rule about leading with the feet because of Slater's technique.

If Farrah was deemed to play the ball with his boot then at worst it would have been no try and QLD penalty. That's how it looked on the big screen sans sports ears and commentary.
 

Someone

Bench
Messages
4,964
penalty try?

he didnt touch inglis, inglis went to ground the ball and farah put his boot inbetween the ground and the ball. its an absolute joke it was awarded.

nail in the coffin
 

bileduct

Coach
Messages
17,832
This was one of the worst decisions I have seen in a while.

In my opinion, Farah wasn't even playing at the ball with his foot. If you watch it in real time he doesn't even have time to react. Inglis has put the ball down on Farah's foot and it has popped out of his hands. It was then knocked forward off Inglis' forearms, so that should have been a knock on right there.
 
Last edited:

Danish

Referee
Messages
32,024
They changed the rule that you can't lead with your feet into a diving player you idiots.

They didn't change the rule to say you have to move your foot out of the way when a fat merkin tries to put the ball on it
 

I Bleed Maroon

Referee
Messages
26,176
Fu{k the rule book. Common sense says it's no try. Where do you think the game is heading if we start awarding trys like that in our so called premium event, straight to hell that's where.

Yes, f**k the rulebook, because that's gonna be healthy for the game.
 

natheel

Coach
Messages
12,137
It's a try for your life.

In my opinion it's as clear as day A try and I will explain why.

Example, In general play under the rule book a defender cannot play at the ball in order to force a knock on, Counter wise if correct call is made, It should be 6 again if that defensive player fails to control the ball in the attempt of stealing it.

It was ruled that Farah played at the ball in order for it to be dislodged from Inglis which is perfectly legal in the event of trying to stop a try. Inglis does not touch the ball and if he did it was a torso touch after he is kicked out of his hands.

Therefore, It's a green light.

Oh f**k off. Torso touch, my arse
 

bileduct

Coach
Messages
17,832
I also thought there was a tackle from QLD in the second half that was very similar to the one Bird was penalised for that went completely unnoticed by the referees.

I can't see Cecchin, Cummins or Hampstead returning for game 2. That was a disgrace.
 

Mader45

Juniors
Messages
664
I thought it was clear as day.

Farah saw the ball way to late and lunged at it. By then Inglis had grabbed the ball and dove at the line. Thats why Farah wasnt touching Inglis. He was going for a ball that wasnt there anymore.
 

bileduct

Coach
Messages
17,832
I thought it was clear as day.

Farah saw the ball way to late and lunged at it. By then Inglis had grabbed the ball and dove at the line. Thats why Farah wasnt touching Inglis. He was going for a ball that wasnt there anymore.
Yup, that's what I thought too.
 

KempoKnight

Juniors
Messages
512
NSW coach Ricky Stuart last night revealed referees boss Bill Harrigan admitted video referee Sean Hampstead should never have awarded Greg Inglis's controversial 73rd-minute try. Inglis clearly knocked on after the ball ricocheted from Robbie Farah's boot onto the Queensland centre's forearms.
It bounced forward into the Blues' in-goal before Inglis planted the ball.
Yet despite numerous replays, Hampstead awarded the try to Inglis, sealing the 18-10 victory for the Maroons.
"Bill Harrigan admitted that the Inglis try should never have been awarded," Stuart told The Daily Telegraph last night.
"And that Greg Bird should not have been penalised for the lifting tackle on Cooper Cronk in the first half.
"He also said Akuila Uate should have been given a penalty when he was elbowed in the head (by Cameron Smith)."

The questionable decisions followed on from Matt Cecchin's first-half sin-binning of Blues centre Michael Jennings.
Earlier at the post-match press conference, Stuart was reluctant to criticise the referees.
"We won't be commenting on any decision in regards to referees tonight," Stuart said through gritted teeth.
In the wash-up, Jennings was slapped with a grade-one contrary conduct charge for charging in and belting Maroons winger Brent Tate in the back of the head. He will be sidelined for a week regardless of his plea.
Worse still for the Blues, Queensland head to ANZ Stadium on June 13 looking to sweep the series and claim their seventh in a row.
History can wait. But about the Inglis try? With seven minutes to go, with his side holding on to a 12-10 lead, the Maroons freight train was awarded the try.
Gallen detonated when the decision eventually came down.
"This is getting out of control," bellowed NSW captain. "This is ridiculous where this is getting."
"He's ruled that it's come off the arm or the leg," referee Ben Cummins said to him.
"He f ... ing dropped the ball," Gallen fumed. "They've had the rub of the green all night. This is out of control. This is ridiculous where this is getting."
Oddly, Stuart said afterwards he believed it was a try.
Was he being sarcastic? Who would know?
"I think it was a try, actually," Stuart said.
"I knew they were going to give it a try.
"They didn't know. They kept having a look at it, but I was very confident they were going to award it."
Maroons prop Matt Scott had sparked the first-half brawl when he threw the ball at lock Greg Bird's head, with players from both sides quickly becoming involved.
Jennings seemingly ran in from interstate, a right-hand haymaker collecting the back of Tate's head.
"It was a silly action," Stuart conceded of Jennings rushing in.
"I won't comment further on that. I wish more people were involved.
"He was the ninth one to run in. A few of them must have popped out of the ground."
Gallen had a running battle with the officials all night, and you can expect a searching inquisition to start as soon as today.
As the players left the field at half-time, the anger of Gallen towards rookie referee Cecchin was palpable. He chased the whistleblower as they left the field and voiced his disapproval at some of his calls.
Stuart's barely veiled rage was not matched by Maroons coach Mal Meninga and his captain Cameron Smith.
Of the Inglis try, Meninga said: "Yes, that's the rules. You can strike at the ball but then it is play on. It was a fair try. Is that the story? Trying to be controversial?"
Meninga described the Jennings punch that led to his sin-binning as a "deliberate act".
Smith agreed: "Jennings came in as the third man and got him in the back of the head."
Said Stuart: "The first six questions you asked Mal were about the referee. Most of you here are experienced rugby league journalists, and have seen a lot of football. Write what Mal and you think."
What did we think? It doesn't really matter. They were two decisions that decided the game.
Doubtless, though, Stuart and his players have searched for years to work out how to beat Queensland.
Now they will think they have to beat the refs, too.



http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...-greg-inglis-try/story-e6frexv9-1226365092333



 

Latest posts

Top