gregstar
Referee
- Messages
- 20,465
bwaaaah! ahahahahahahahaah!effnic said:Now please shut the f**k up.
now tell us about the second half.
bwaaaah! ahahahahahahahaah!effnic said:Now please shut the f**k up.
gregstar said:bwaaaah! ahahahahahahahaah!
now tell us about the second half.
CharlieF said:No more than 5 touches in the second half. He did make 20 tackles though. Pretty high for a centre.
Just as a comparison, Gasnier made no tackles, Tate made 2, Ingliss made 1 and Hunt made an amazing 6. I guess we can see who was doing all the defensive work in the backs as all his tackles alone is more than double all the rest of the Aussie centres and wingers managed together. Australia was beaten because they were outmuscled in the forwards. The Kiwis did the same thing, but Australia jagged a very lucky late win.
There is no need to single out particular players. It is obvious from the last 4-5 years that the level of competetion from NZ and GB has improved considerably. I think that in about 5-10 year we will have a pretty even international competetion.
Twizzle said:pretty hard for Gaz to make tackles while he's in the sheds
kia ora storm said:Ricky stuffed up...Lyon was average and playing Cam Smith off the bench makes no sense.
Hodges should be playing as should King.
CharlieF said:I think we can now put to rest the theory about the Aussies being able to field 2, maybe 3 RL Test teams capable of beating GB or NZ.
Twizzle said:I think we have a destinct lack of depth in the halves, which was exposed last night, so I'd agree with you on that
CharlieF said:No more than 5 touches in the second half. He did make 20 tackles though. Pretty high for a centre.
Just as a comparison, Gasnier made no tackles, Tate made 2, Ingliss made 1 and Hunt made an amazing 6. I guess we can see who was doing all the defensive work in the backs as all his tackles alone is more than double all the rest of the Aussie centres and wingers managed together. Australia was beaten because they were outmuscled in the forwards. The Kiwis did the same thing, but Australia jagged a very lucky late win.
There is no need to single out particular players. It is obvious from the last 4-5 years that the level of competetion from NZ and GB has improved considerably. I think that in about 5-10 year we will have a pretty even international competetion.
Inferno said:Mini was gone most of the year and Anasta was injured most of the year as well. The Roosters had one of the worst packs in the comp and it showed.
Touche Saab :lol:
I mean trying some different. Instead of being stuck with the same halves for the last 10 weeks.
Have to disagree on Covell though. He was easily the pick of our back 3 this year. That doesn't say much about the other 2 though.
CharlieF said:I think we can now put to rest the theory about the Aussies being able to field 2, maybe 3 RL Test teams capable of beating GB or NZ.
colonel_123 said:It seems to me Australia is a Darren Lockyer away from coming back to the pack.
No Johns, no Fittler, no Webcke and alot resting on the shoulders of Darren Lockyer. Take him out and what are you left with?
6. Barrett
7. Gower
NZ 24 - Aus 0
Mr Saab said:Tis is true.
Then the fun will begin when Benji and Sonny Bill tear australia a new one
Holla if ya hear me said:Tupou should NEVER ever be allowed near an australian jumper AT ALL...crap for the roosters for most of the year..