Bgoodorgoodatit
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,525
just what i believe should be the 11 for the south africa test series
understand this will never happen with the muppets that currently occupy the selection board
1. kattich
2. hughes
3. ponting
4. hussey
5. clarke
6. haddin
7. johnson
8. bracken
9. siddle
10. hilfy
11. mcgain
justification starting form the top
- cant ignore hughes form. blood him on this tour. guys like him are the future. lets not wait till his 30 ish. jaques could be considered unlucky and could come back in for him for the ashes as this would give him a chance to recover from his injury properly in shield cricket.
- lets piss off the all rounder jack of all master of none number six. johnson ( as much as he sh*ts me ) can fill the spot from 7 with haddin slotting into 6, as it sems to me that we can manage to eek out enough runs with an underperfoming number six to win a test but cant for the life of us take twenty wickets.
- bollinger unlucky to miss out but i think the balance is better with 2 lefties and two righties
- if we cant take 20 wickets with 4 varying seamers and a quality spinner( i.e. not haury) ill s**t in my hat.
- assumes that S. Clark is injured and Lee is sent to india to do bollywood movies permanently (unless he can take some wickets in shield matches and get some form on the board).
thoughts?
i would challenge anyone to justify that our current selection of bowling 'specials' lee, johoson, siddle and crazy (or haury) could do better then what is posted here
understand this will never happen with the muppets that currently occupy the selection board
1. kattich
2. hughes
3. ponting
4. hussey
5. clarke
6. haddin
7. johnson
8. bracken
9. siddle
10. hilfy
11. mcgain
justification starting form the top
- cant ignore hughes form. blood him on this tour. guys like him are the future. lets not wait till his 30 ish. jaques could be considered unlucky and could come back in for him for the ashes as this would give him a chance to recover from his injury properly in shield cricket.
- lets piss off the all rounder jack of all master of none number six. johnson ( as much as he sh*ts me ) can fill the spot from 7 with haddin slotting into 6, as it sems to me that we can manage to eek out enough runs with an underperfoming number six to win a test but cant for the life of us take twenty wickets.
- bollinger unlucky to miss out but i think the balance is better with 2 lefties and two righties
- if we cant take 20 wickets with 4 varying seamers and a quality spinner( i.e. not haury) ill s**t in my hat.
- assumes that S. Clark is injured and Lee is sent to india to do bollywood movies permanently (unless he can take some wickets in shield matches and get some form on the board).
thoughts?
i would challenge anyone to justify that our current selection of bowling 'specials' lee, johoson, siddle and crazy (or haury) could do better then what is posted here