The 2016 'What Could Have Been' Ladder

[woddy]

Still in the 8 but it's looking sad with points diff....
ROUND

24


2016 Ladder
Team G W L D F A PD P
1 Storm 21 17 4 0 483 252 231 38
2 Sharks 21 16 4 1 531 354 177 37
3 Raiders 21 14 6 1 564 398 166 33
4 Bulldogs 21 14 7 0 470 376 94 32
5 Cowboys 21 12 9 0 494 317 177 28
6 Broncos 21 12 9 0 484 394 90 28
7 Panthers 21 11 10 0 472 433 39 26
8 Eels 21 11 10 0 374 379 -5 26
9 Titans 21 10 10 1 452 444 8 25
10 Warriors 21 10 11 0 465 491 -26 24
11 Tigers 21 10 11 0 443 491 -48 24
12 Dragons 21 9 12 0 289 440 -151 22
13 Sea Eagles 21 8 13 0 400 445 -45 20
14 Rabbitohs 21 6 15 0 399 521 -122 16
15 Roosters 21 5 16 0 375 509 -134 14
16 Knights 21 1 19 1 261 712 -451 7

 

[strider]

I dont think thats updated yet ... sadly the titans are on 27

 

[Gary Gutful]

Boooo!!!!!

 

[hineyrulz]

Boooo!!!!!

Racist.

 

[woddy]

Thanx Strider ...I'll update when DT pull their fingers out.

 

[Gary Gutful]

F**ken DT.

Slow, useless merkins...

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

I dont think thats updated yet ... sadly the titans are on 27

Oh ffs! If we don't make the finals this year Arthur has to go!!

 

[woddy]

2016 Ladder
Team G W L D F A PD P
1 Storm 22 18 4 0 521 270 251 40
2 Sharks 22 16 5 1 537 366 171 37
3 Raiders 22 15 6 1 592 416 176 35
4 Bulldogs 22 14 8 0 480 396 84 32
5 Cowboys 22 13 9 0 528 323 205 30
6 Broncos 22 13 9 0 504 404 100 30
7 Panthers 22 12 10 0 512 443 69 28
8 Titans 22 11 10 1 478 450 28 27
9 Eels 22 11 11 0 392 407 -15 26
10 Warriors 22 10 12 0 471 525 -54 24
11 Tigers 22 10 12 0 453 531 -78 24
12 Dragons 22 9 13 0 295 482 -187 22
13 Sea Eagles 22 8 14 0 418 483 -65 20
14 Rabbitohs 22 7 15 0 411 527 -116 18
15 Roosters 22 6 16 0 417 515 -98 16
16 Knights 22 1 20 1 267 738 -471 7

 

[Noise]

In the 2016 prediction thread I predicted we'd come 9th

 

[Redback71]

I have no doubt in my mind that the Eels would have been minor premiers this season, if it was not for all the shit that has happened which is solely the fault of the board of directors.

Who knows we may have even won the Grandfinal.

Bring on 2017.

 

[Gary Gutful]

Would have won the World Club Challenge too.

 

[Happy MEel]

Great stuff Woddy, thanks again mate.

 

[Gary Gutful]

The cut off for the 8 looks like it will be a lot higher this year than in previous years. Hasn't 26-28 gotten teams in before?

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

The cut off for the 8 looks like it will be a lot higher this year than in previous years. Hasn't 26-28 gotten teams in before?

I'm sure it has. Did we have 27 in 09?

 

[hineyrulz]

Newcastle being utter Walrus shit and us losing 12 points has played a part.

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

Newcastle being utter Walrus shit and us losing 12 points has played a part.

Our 12 points didn't go to anyone so it made little difference. Newcastle, yeah. And the Broncos slump.

 

[emjaycee]

In the 16 seasons since 2000, 28 points has been the cut-off for 8th on 9 occasions.
26 was the cut-off in 2000/01/04
25 in 2002
24 in 2007
29 in 2009
and a massive 30 in 2008 which 3 teams tied on.

 

[BoneyBlake17]

In the 16 seasons since 2000, 28 points has been the cut-off for 8th on 9 occasions.
26 was the cut-off in 2000/01/04
25 in 2002
24 in 2007
29 in 2009
and a massive 30 in 2008 which 3 teams tied on.

2002 was low with 25 cause the dogs lost 39 pts for the salary cap do that was aberration

And the 2007 season only had 1 bye but yeah 28 so 50% win loss record generally gets you in

A shame our f/a was shit in 2014 cost us a finals place

 

[emjaycee]

2002 was low with 25 cause the dogs lost 39 pts for the salary cap do that was aberration

And the 2007 season only had 1 bye but yeah 28 so 50% win loss record generally gets you in

A shame our f/a was shit in 2014 cost us a finals place

Actually, the Bulldogs losing their points in 2002 didn't have an impact because 2 teams finished on 25 and both made the 8. The Bulldogs going through the year only losing 3 games is what caused it to be a lower cut-off.

Same when it was 24 points in 2007 because Melbourne lost only 3 and Manly lost only 6. As soon as 1 or 2 teams win such a huge percentage of games, the cut-off is lowered. And when 1 or 2 teams lose a large percentage of games (such as Newcastle this year) the cut-off is higher.

There are 448 points available to share each year and with a mean average of 28 so the median will slide up or down depending on the top and bottom splits.

 

[Gary Gutful]

In the 16 seasons since 2000, 28 points has been the cut-off for 8th on 9 occasions.
26 was the cut-off in 2000/01/04
25 in 2002
24 in 2007
29 in 2009
and a massive 30 in 2008 which 3 teams tied on.

Thanks mate. I knew that some nerdy merkin would do the research.