CliffyIsGod
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,454
No one wants that.Fortunately Hastings can cover Api at hooker for a week.
No one wants that.Fortunately Hastings can cover Api at hooker for a week.
I do.No one wants that.
Funny that typical LU plebs were calling Manly broke because they didn't fly a bloke to Melbourne to hold a stopwatch yet it turns out that even Melbourne didn't supply a timekeeper. Seems like the system is broken if clubs can pick and choose whether they supply officials. That said, keeping time should always be the responsibility of the NRL.
NRL don't know consistency.The last time something similar happened - Weyman on Daniel Connjob - the offender copped a 6 week ban, and that was without a fractured eye socket.
I’d love to know how the same thing is now only 2 weeks.
The last time something similar happened - Weyman on Daniel Connjob - the offender copped a 6 week ban, and that was without a fractured eye socket.
I’d love to know how the same thing is now only 2 weeks.
In court, not in the NRL.This isn’t rape, this isn’t suicide. This is a punch, which consent can be used as a defence for.
That’s not how it works.
Judiciary has no fcking idea, one match for a coward punch from the blind side, 3 matches for shutting up a gobby sht who was asking for it all game. The game is a farce, thank god I am old enough to have enjoyed it in the 80’s and 90’s.
On that basis Ennis would be dead. Again, not how it works.But it’s true.
This is more or less what happens in cricket with ball tampering, its up to the home side's broadcast team, ever since it was made clear that umpires would be booted out of the game if they caught anyone.It’s like having to have the home team appoint a video ref.
...
Edit* Hopefully someone punches the merkin out of Will chambers next..
This isn’t rape, this isn’t suicide. This is a punch, which consent can be used as a defence for.
Consent can be used as a defence for assault
We should trust in the systems and processes used by the NRL. I am confident Mr. Todd Greenberg will provide a suitable response which will ensure all parties involved are satisfied and the game can move on from this unfortunate incident.
He was binned for being a walkerThat deal is done. Light sentence for Scott in exchange for not throwing a tantrum and putting the heat on the NRL.
Manly get stiffed losing their centre for 6 weeks. Storm for two.
I've still never heard of a player getting sin inner for chat against the opposition, and that is the only reason I've read that led to walker been sin binned.