What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Strategic Plan (2013-2017)

Lockyer4President!

First Grade
Messages
7,975
Must have some big plans...

Grant flags compromise for future
December 11, 2012
Glenn Jackson

...

Asked whether he was willing to compromise on the $225 million set aside for the future fund, Grant said: ''We'll see. We'll have to wait and see. As I said to the players, the future fund is $225 million, but the costs of implementing the strategic plan is considerably more that that.'' Still, there was a bullish footnote. ''We need to reach a compromise, and if we can't reach a compromise, then I guess we need to make a decision, and I'd prefer not to be in the position of having to make a decision,'' Grant said. ''That's our responsibility as the commission.
''If we can't reach an agreement, what do you do next? The only thing we can do is make the decision we think is right for the game.'' Asked how the commission came to the $225 million figure, Grant said officials had done so knowing that the AFL has put aside far more in recent years: ''We costed the strategic plan - what would it cost to implement all of the initiatives in the strategic plan, and we came up with $300 million more than the $225 million?
''Either you want to grow your game, or you don't. Our responsibility is to the whole of [the] game, and to growing this game. The players are an absolute vital part of that. But along the way, we have to come to a meeting of minds on this.''
With the players having been given an address about the future fund last Friday, Grant discussed the issue with the clubs, as well as key officials at Monday's Christmas lunch - with only representatives of the Warriors, Newcastle, Manly and Gold Coast absent - and plans to brief the clubs in the same way he did the players in the new year.
''At the moment, that's what we think is the amount of money which is needed to grow this game,'' Grant said. ''It's pretty much a stake in the ground. We'll deal with that over time … we briefed the players, and the reason for that was to give them some context for the finances of the game, that they benefit from. Our intent is to keep a very sizeable amount of money to develop this game. I think they [players] understood it.''

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/grant-flags-compromise-for-future-20121210-2b5p3.html
 

100%green

Juniors
Messages
514
If this is the case then the players need to meet in the middle, o point in wanting more money if there is no growth the the future of the game.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
66,815
call their bluff. Offer to put up the cap a bit but only in the min wage. Then we will see how cohesive a group the big name players are!

For a game our size a top player is capable of earning $7-800k which is a fair reflection of the size of the sport imo . If they want more go play Union in Japan or France before the bubble bursts.

They are getting 45%+ of the TV deal, how much more do they want?
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top