What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

thurston couldnt play off the bench?

nqcowboy87

Bench
Messages
4,181
while saying this i reckon thurston should have a run-on spot but that would apparently throw team dynamics:roll:, even so some people reckon he couldntr play off the bench, what about the 04 grand final he made an impact
almost scored off a kick chase to, and alan smith reckons he couldnt play hooker, i reckon he could make a go of it.
 

sydraider

First Grade
Messages
5,704
They would be mad not to pick him but hey its rep footy we talking about, form does not always count.
 

DeeGan

Bench
Messages
2,800
Andrew Moore in the video clip to the left on this forum sums it up perfectly when sighting the reasons behind why Thurston shouldn't be picked in the Test side - it's a load of rubbish. Can't play as a utility? Give me a break - Thurston can cover hooker, halfback and five-eight. I am sure he could play as a ball playing lock similar to a Scott Hill if required as well.

We should be looking at excuses to pick rather than not picking him.
 

Bernster

Juniors
Messages
674
Like Samuel L Jackson said before he got the part of Master Mace Windu in the Star Wars Prequel -

"I want to be in Star Wars...Even if I am the Third Stormtrooper on the Right.":cool:
 
Messages
6,120
now u guys know how it feels too be a tigers supporter and see how many tigers players deserve a go but never got it what makes thurston any different Hodgson has been the tiges best for the last 2 and a half years Thurston for about a year
 

Cletus

First Grade
Messages
7,171
joel caine number 1 fan said:
now u guys know how it feels too be a tigers supporter and see how many tigers players deserve a go but never got it what makes thurston any different Hodgson has been the tiges best for the last 2 and a half years Thurston for about a year

The difference is Minichiello(sp) is better than Hodgson but Lockyer isn't better than Thurston ATM.
 

Jobdog

Live Update Team
Messages
25,696
Judging by tonights performance from the Cowboys, Thurston just might have played himself out of an Aussie jumper .........
 

DeeGan

Bench
Messages
2,800
Jobdog said:
Judging by tonights performance from the Cowboys, Thurston just might have played himself out of an Aussie jumper .........

One game is all it takes to rule out the form player of the competition?

In what was a terrible game and the worst performance from a Cowboys side in 18mths, Thurston was thereabouts the best for the Cowboys IMO. Scored a try, put Sweeney over in the corner for another and had 120m+ bagging 10pts.
 

Cletus

First Grade
Messages
7,171
Jobdog said:
Judging by tonights performance from the Cowboys, Thurston just might have played himself out of an Aussie jumper .........

I didn't think he was that bad tbh. I still don't think he'll get a spot though. Who knows, find out tommorow I guess.
 
Messages
6,120
One game is all it takes to rule out the form player of the competition?

any diffrence between prince form of 05 early on and thurston this year? yes 1 game is all it takes


The difference is Minichiello(sp) is better than Hodgson but Lockyer isn't better than Thurston ATM.

in what part Hodgson is one of the best support players around just watch hes final series the way he tore up both Cowboys and Broncos and its not like he has no attack he was in the top 3 in line breaks last year plus all the try savers he got
 

Cletus

First Grade
Messages
7,171
It's just personal opinion Joel and I think Mini is better than Hodgo. His kick returns are definately better, he's harder to put down. It's not that I think Hodgson is bad.
 

DeeGan

Bench
Messages
2,800
joel caine number 1 fan said:
any diffrence between prince form of 05 early on and thurston this year? yes 1 game is all it takes

Scott Prince was apart of a football side this time last season who had won 3 games from 7 sitting on 8pts with 1 bye - yes, there is a difference. Prince's early season 2005 form was nothing in comparison to what happened from mid year onward when he was no longer concentrating on the possible Origin jersey that Thurston took from him.

Johnathan Thurston is the form player of the competition in 2006 in a side that has now lost only their second game of the season in his team's worst performance of the season.

Is there a difference here? Yes, yes there is ;-)
 
Messages
6,120
Scott Prince was apart of a football side this time last season who had won 3 games from 7 sitting on 8pts with 1 bye - yes, there is a difference. Prince's early season 2005 form was nothing in comparison to what happened from mid year onward when he was no longer concentrating on the possible Origin jersey that Thurston took from him.

Johnathan Thurston is the form player of the competition in 2006 in a side that has now lost only their second game of the season in his team's worst performance of the season.

Is there a difference here? Yes, yes there is

so it was just hes fault our defense sucks we were in all those games Prince basically won us 2 of those games with a winning f/g vs dogs and a winning try vs roosters
 

DeeGan

Bench
Messages
2,800
joel caine number 1 fan said:
so it was just hes fault our defense sucks we were in all those games Prince basically won us 2 of those games with a winning f/g vs dogs and a winning try vs roosters

The form of Thurston early 2006 is better than that of Scott Prince in early 2005 - end of story for mine. Prince was never being pushed to make his Test debut for the May Test as Thurston has been in 2006 now was he?

I am Prince fan though let's get be real, he was not dominating the competition as Thurston has done thus far in 2006. After Origin, yes, early season, no.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,345
joel caine number 1 fan said:
so it was just hes fault our defense sucks we were in all those games Prince basically won us 2 of those games with a winning f/g vs dogs and a winning try vs roosters

Prince had his chance on the tri-nations tour and was pretty poor. In the end even if the tigers were playing well, he has no chance of being picked.
 
Messages
6,120
Prince had his chance on the tri-nations tour and was pretty poor. In the end even if the tigers were playing well, he has no chance of being picked.

did he even play in that 24-0 loss too nz in the final ?? gotta say that the team played pretty bad than yet halfd the team is still there :roll:
 

Latest posts

Top