What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tingha to remain a Dragon

Willow

Assistant Moderator
Messages
110,092
From the Jubilee Avenue site: Blacklock still a Saint
Wed Aug 1, 5:00pm
Written by: Dragons Media Release
St George Illawarra Dragons today issued a press statement saying they were disappointed with the headline "I want to quit" which was attributed to Nathan Blacklock, but stated it would not unsettle their preparations for Friday night's big game against the Parramatta Eels.
The Dragons stated that the facts of the matter are:
· Nathan signed a four-year contract with the Dragons on the 4th July 2000 ensuring he played until the end of 2004.
· The four-year term being an extended term, recognised Nathan's and the Dragon's interest in a long-term relationship.
· Given the four-year term, both parties thought it appropriate to include a Clause that would enable an upgrade to occur if and when Nathan played State of Origin or for Australia.
· Nathan was disappointed with his non-selection in State of Origin at the time and was contemplating Rugby Union.
· The Club was, as were many Rugby League followers, very pleased to see Nathan added to the Australian Touring Party.
· The Club had been negotiating the upgrade to Nathan's contract prior to him being added to the Touring Party, based on Nathan's performances for the Dragons in 2001 - again not an uncommon practice in Football Clubs.
· The Club expects to finalise the negotiations this week.
Chief Executive Officer of the Dragons Peter Doust said he was surprised by the headline given his conversations with Nathan. "Nathan and I have developed a very close relationship over the 12 months I have been involved with the Club and only this week, arising from the rumours, we agreed we couldn't see him in anything other than the red and white". He went on to say "The Club believes Nathan will play Rugby League at the top level for a long time and we see his contribution to the Dragons as a very important element of our success going forward".
Nathan Blacklock stated "I agree, I can't see myself in anything other than the red and white".
Looking more like a typical Telegraph media beat up every hour. What a bunch of mongrels. And don't think that Chris Anderson had nothing to do with this.
 

Willow

Assistant Moderator
Messages
110,092
Yeah, I know I'm replying to my own Dragons post but I wanted this info to be on this forum as well as the old place. Naturally, it looks better here.
emwink.gif


Here's what caused all the panic. The Daily Telegraph (Sydney), 1st Aug 2001:
fetch.dll


The news this evening:
Blacklock a Dragon until 2004
Wed Aug 1, 8:20pm
Written by: Michael Murray
Dragons fans all over the world can breathe a sigh of relief with tonight's news that favourite son Nathan Blacklock has been re-signed until the end of 2004.
NRL on Fox has reported that a new deal was struck early this evening, minus the controversial clause which would have given him the option to leave the club if he was selected for Australia.
Contrary to an irresponsible newspaper report in today's Telegraph, the superstar winger is more than happy with his situation.
"I can't see myself in anything other than the red and white," Blacklock said earlier today.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Telegraph's feedback link can be accessed here: http://www.dailytelegraph.news.com.au/
I just sent them this message:

re the Nathan Blacklock article by KATRINA BEIKOFF
Dear Telegraph,
Who does your research?
It is my opinion that this article was designed to create concern.
It lacked facts, it lacked credibility.
This has been shown by the recent news that Nathan Blacklock
has just signed with the Dragons until 2004. A fact that your
website editor has yet to pick up on, even as I write this email.
Under the circumstances, a front page apology from your
publication would be the least you could do.
Looking forward to your thoughts on this matter.
Yours sincerely,
<insert name>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In case you hadn't guessed, one of my great hates are the tabloid press.
You wouldn't believe that this paper is supposed to be one of the main backers of rugby league.
Low lifes all round.




 

Willow

Assistant Moderator
Messages
110,092
Bopper I was thinking about that earlier this arvo as well.
He WAS on $170,000 per year.
We'll find out for sure later but I wouldn't be using the Telegraph as my source.
My guess is over $200K but less than $300K. Say, $230,000??? Wild guess.
In the current market he is worth at least this.
But I know the next question is does this compromise Saints' buying power for other other big names (under the cap)?
Maybe. But only if they were actually buying anyone. Which they ain't..
 

Latest posts

Top