What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Top 8 calculator

Y2Eel

First Grade
Messages
8,176
1 Roosters 46
2 Bulldogs 44
3 Broncos 40
4 Panthers 34
5 Dragons 32
6 Raiders 32
7 Storm 30
8 Eels 28
9 Knights 28
10 Wests Tigers 24
11 Sharks 22
12 Cowboys 19
13 Rabbitohs 17
14 Sea Eagles 12
15 Warriors 12


Panthers v Dragons
Broncos v Raiders
Bulldogs v Storm
Roosters v Eels


thats if we win next 6 and get the bye
hopefully we can upset the storm panthers and roosters at least once...
 

MystikEel

Juniors
Messages
2,098
1 Roosters 42
2 Bulldogs 42
3 Broncos 38
4 Panthers 34
5 Raiders 34
6 Dragons 32
7 Eels 32
8 Knights 28
9 Sharks 24
10 Cowboys 23
11 Wests Tigers 22
12 Storm 22
13 Sea Eagles 18
14 Rabbitohs 15
15 Warriors 14

****

Not tooo bad... I think I put the roosters and bulldogs down to win too many times. Oh well.. :roll:
 

Suitman

Post Whore
Messages
56,273
Eels Dude said:
Suitman said:
Based on season percentages - wins/losses. Byes not taken into acount.

1. Roosters 42
2. Bulldogs 38
3. Panthers 35
4. Broncos 35
5. Storm 31
6. Dragons29
7. Cowboys 26
8. Knights 25
9. Raiders 25
10. Tigers 25
11. Sharks 25
12.Eels 22
13. Souths 19
14. Manly 15
15. Warriors 15.

Looks pretty sad. Lets hope the return of injured players has a major effect on our performances.

Suity

Did you use the calculator to come up with that?

Yes, it was completely percentage based. Didn't you read the first line?

Suity
 

Eels Dude

Coach
Messages
19,065
Suitman said:
Yes, it was completely percentage based. Didn't you read the first line?

Suity

I did read the first line but figured you'd rather come up with some sort of formula for your table, because what is logically the point with basing the end of season table on percentages? It means nothing.
 

Eels Dude

Coach
Messages
19,065
It means something because that's what people predict is going to happen. Your table isn't predicting anything. It begs the question because it's assuming that form over 16 rounds equates to form over 26 rounds. If that's the case why bother making a prediction at all?
 

Misty Bee

First Grade
Messages
7,082
Hey, it's all conjecture. But it has shown a range of scenarios, that suggest that we are gunning forthe same finish as last year - ie we will probably either jag 7th or 8th with a bit of luck, or miss out.
 

The Engineers Room

First Grade
Messages
8,945
Parramatta will not make the eight. I'm hoping they do. But they just don't have the form to get there. We lost 6 - 8 points mid season that we would have had.
 

Misty Bee

First Grade
Messages
7,082
5 of them have changed coaches in the last 18 months. All, bar NZ, who only changed a few weeks ago, have either improved or a buying up big to improve in 2005.

And of the failues, how many of them will have the same coach until 2007?
 
Messages
2,227
1 Roosters 44
2 Bulldogs 42
3 Panthers 38
4 Broncos 38
5 Dragons 36
6 Storm 32
7 Raiders 30
8 Eels 26
9 Knights 26
10 Wests Tigers 22
11 Cowboys 21
12 Sharks 20
13 Sea Eagles 18
14 Warriors 14
15 Rabbitohs 13
 

The Engineers Room

First Grade
Messages
8,945
Our worst fears:

1 Roosters 38
2 Panthers 36
3 Dragons 34
4 Bulldogs 34
5 Storm 34
6 Broncos 32
7 Knights 28
8 Raiders 26
9 Wests Tigers 26
10 Cowboys 25
11 Sea Eagles 24
12 Sharks 24
13 Warriors 22
14 Rabbitohs 21
15 Eels 16
 

Rylesy

Juniors
Messages
348
1 Roosters 46
2 Bulldogs 44
3 Broncos 40
4 Panthers 36
5 Dragons 34 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)
6 Raiders 30
7 Eels 28
8 Knights 28
9 Wests Tigers 26
10 Storm 24
11 Cowboys 21
12 Sharks 20
13 Sea Eagles 16
14 Rabbitohs 15
15 Warriors 12
 

Latest posts

Top