What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tri-Nations Game 1

Timbo

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,281
We've started horribly, suprise suprise.

Being thoroughly outclassed across the paddock so far.

And are they shooting the footage of this game on a mobile phone camera or what? On Ch.7 and Fox it's as blurry as anything, S14 from South Africa had much better footage than this.
 

Timbo

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,281
Whoo boy did we blow that one.

Larkham and Huxley must have failed to find touch from inside the 22 a dozen times, two of which led to the two match winning drop goals from the Springboks.

Also, our backline defence was attrocious, they were making ridiculous metres just by putting it through the hands. I'd like to single out Stirling Mortlock for particularly awful defence, he appeared to have about ten flashbacks to the 2003 WC semi final, going for a 'hero' intercept when one was never there.

Also-and I'm not blaming this for the loss-but how awful was that referee? God I hope he's not on the WC list, he seemed to only have a passing knowledge of the rules of Rugby at best.
 
Messages
33,280
huxley sucked big time

the ref butchered most of the scrums, but typical wallaby fashion blew a chance to beat south africa in south africa, that passage where the boks had nearly 20 phases was brilliant defending till elsom f**ked it all, much frustration watching them
 

Mal Meninga

Bench
Messages
3,412
Ref was bad for both sides. Sending Spies off for trying to get back on side was a joke! Sure Spies had a warning or two but he didn't even know where the ball was.

The one thing that stood out was the scramble around the ruck by the Aussies, really showed grit and desperation which nearly got them over the line. I think the defense was abit ordinary due to the starvation of footy but for the most part was very strong. Also the scrum was definately a strong point and set peice wasn't too rattled at line out.

Saffies shouldve put up 50 early on and despite being hauled back deserved the win. I said it a few months ago, Steyn needs to be 5/8. More elusive and urgent when required. The inept play of some players like Butch James or Willemse really brings the outstanding pack back to earth. Some of those runs by Spies later in the game put the Wallabies under enormaus pressure off the scrum and Burger.... how good is he?
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
154,028
Wallabies tagged by Steyn

From James Whitmore in Cape Town, South Africa
June 17, 2007

AUSTRALIA suffered heartbreak in Cape Town this morning, the Wallabies denied their first victory in South Africa since 2000 by two drop goals in the final six minutes.

Replacement back Francois Steyn landed the two drop goals to give the Springboks a nail-biting 22-19 win in the Tri-Nations series opener at Newlands.

Australia led 19-10 after 44 minutes, but the Springboks rallied to score 12 unanswered points to ensure a winning start to the competition.

Sharks back Steyn, who replaced wing Ashwin Willemse with 20 minutes to play, first succeeded with a difficult 50-metre effort after 74 minute to level the scores at 19-all.

He landed the hammer blow four minutes later, this time from in front of the uprights.

The result extended to seven matches Australia's losing streak in the Republic. Australia has not won in South Africa since defeating the Springboks 19-18 at King's Park, Durban, in 2000.

"It was a very close affair throughout the afternoon," South Africa captain John Smit said.

"But thanks to our replacements, who made a massive difference when they came on, we were fortunate to sneak it at the end.

"Those fresh legs brought a positive influence to the team when they got on to the field, and I think we showed great character there at the end."

Smit, who left the field early with a suspected hamstring injury, had to watch the drama unfold from the sidelines.

He said the Boks' performance was one of the better efforts he'd been part of for some time.

"I think it was some of the best rugby we've played," he said.

"We created good opportunities and dominated for long periods, but just couldn't convert those chances.

"We had to really grind it out, and the way we did it was very special."

Wallabies captain Stirling Mortlock was obviously disappointed at losing the game, especially considering that his side was three points up with just six minutes left to play.

"We gave it our all and I thought we showed a lot of courage out there," he said.

"I was particularly happy with our defence and the character we showed throughout the contest."

The match certainly provided a thrilling start to the 2007 series, with the Wallabies, derided by many pundits as no-hopers before kick off, playing a major role.

Mortlock and his troops defended like Trojans and stifled a number of good attacking moves by South Africa to enjoy a surprising 16-10 lead at the break.

The Boks started the match superbly, with their forwards asking plenty of the Australia pack, but the score was 3-3 after 10 minutes, through penalties from South Africa full back Percy Montgomery and Mortlock.

South Africa lost Smit in the 11th minute before scoring its only try through centre Jaque Fourie.

The Sprinboks then failed to convert numerous chances while enjoying the lion's share of possession, and the Wallabies made them pay for their profligacy.

The visitors found their rhythm after half an hour and, after taking the ball through a number of phases, won a penalty that Mortlock converted.

Centre Matt Giteau then scored a fine converted try next to the uprights, taking an offload from hooker Stephen Moore, that put his side in front for the first time.

Mortlock landed another penalty goal to give Australia its six-point edge at the break.

Australia quickly stretched that lead to nine points, with Mortlock's fourth penalty, but a rejuvenated Bok outfit struck back through Montgomery, who kicked two penalty goals, before Steyn made his dramatic late intervention.

Agence France-Presse

http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,21919706-23217,00.html
 

Stevo_G

Juniors
Messages
696
very surprising, i'm not a ru fan but actually watched the whole match don't kno wat to say
very unlucky aussies were
 

Mal Meninga

Bench
Messages
3,412
All Larkham and Huxley had to do was KICK THE BALL OUT. No idea how that's 'lucky' or 'unlucky' but surely a bloke who's played 90+ tests would know that any out is better than kicking it straight to a guy who can kick FG's from 60m's out.

On top of that Elsom made his bed. The Box weren't going to score given their backline operator was going backwards or kicking nearly every time. Why he tried to kill what was already slow ball i'll never know.
 

Timbo

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,281
Mortlock has to go IMO. No bloody idea who can replace him, but he was awful last night, and has been for some time.
 
Messages
17,822
Timbo said:
Mortlock has to go IMO. No bloody idea who can replace him, but he was awful last night, and has been for some time.

Big Call ??...he has had a few injuries and concussion and when on form can win a game for the Wannabies.:cool:
 

SpaceMonkey

Immortal
Messages
40,741
Doesn't bode too well for the Saffers I reckon. They won't be able to rely on 50 metre droppies to save their arses when they're playing in the rain at sea level away from home somewhere.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,348
Timbo said:
Mortlock has to go IMO. No bloody idea who can replace him, but he was awful last night, and has been for some time.

Ryan Cross or Ashley Cooper should replace him, and Shephard HAS to replace Huxley as Huxley is crap, plus Shephard can goalkick as well.
 

skeepe

Immortal
Messages
48,324
It's Adam Ashley-Cooper, not Ashley Cooper you dunce.

Agree on Huxley, his form hasn't been the best. I still think he has what it takes, just taking a little while to show it much like Latham did (although I am in no way comparing him to Latham).

How good was it to see King George at his rightful place, with the number 9 on his back? Clearly the best scrum half in the world. The only problem I had with the team is the hooker situation... Connolly bemoans the throwing, yet leaves the guy who was far and away the best hooker in the Super 14 competition playing for Royals in the Canberra competition.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,348
Huxley has been rubbish, full stop. Will never be a great 15. We have 3 great 15's in Latham, Shephard and Mitchell. No need to play a madiocre one there. As for the hookers, Moore was good on Saturday. Freier was rubbish granted but who else is there. I am not sold on Paul as he is erratic with his throwing as well, Polau-Nau could be worth a punt.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,348
Tonearm Terrorwrist said:
umm, no, peter hewatt sh*ts all over cooper and cross and is a better kicker than shepard

Hewat is NOT a outside centre, and we have a million fullbacks and wingers! If we are replacing Mortlock we are looking for a centre not a fullback. Shephard/Latham deserve to be the best 2 fullbacks as they have the form/experience on the board. Hewat has been in awful form this year! Cross and Adam Ashley-Cooper should come under consideration for centre positions.
 

Latest posts

Top