Victor Radley is a great competitor and a match winner.
Victor Radley is a great competitor and a match winner.
He and Latrell Mitchell could win the Grand Final for the Roosters.
They are indeed play makers in a competition devoid of them.
I hope there is a place in the game for Radley but I am pretty certain he is too small and it will force him into the centres or halves where he will just be another guy with a bit of skill.
Radley is not small. He is tall. He just needs to bulk up. At age 20 he still has a couple of years to develop physically. At that point he will be first choice Australian second rower.
Albert Kelly or El-Bet Killy if you’re Ben Ikin.Another of those names that the commentators love to say in full. Like Agnatius Paasi and Jack deBelin.
Lol "too small".They are indeed play makers in a competition devoid of them.
I hope there is a place in the game for Radley but I am pretty certain he is too small and it will force him into the centres or halves where he will just be another guy with a bit of skill.
Lol "too small".
He snaps forwards in half for fun.
He's doing just fine in the forwards and will only get bigger & stronger.
People seem to forget that 'mass' is just one half of the equation for 'force'. The other half is 'acceleration'.Bunny Reilly was no giant yet he did not earn the nickname "The Axe" for nothing.
Victor Radley could be 1kg and he’d still roll any player in the comp
Some logic to this. For example if you had a choice between Steve Matai and Martin Kennedy to run at who do you pick?People seem to forget that 'mass' is just one half of the equation for 'force'. The other half is 'acceleration'.
And being specific to Rugby League and tackling you also have the essentials of technique and timing.
Point being, you'd rather be a 92kg ferocious axe with tremendous speed, timing & technique than a 120kg fat lazy shit with no fire like Dave Taylor.