- Messages
- 65,583
AlexTheEel said:It was the wrong call mate.
I know, but that's beside the point..the point is that the call becomes the discretion of the officials and unfortunately it doesn't make it a right or wrong call.
AlexTheEel said:It was the wrong call mate.
Kornstar said:Sorry, but that is bullsh*t!!!! Did Witt end up over the line after the infringement???? No! He was about 4 metres off.....sorry, you could not be certain he was going to score!!!! If he ended up over the line, then fair enough, he probably would have scored BUT he was pulled down a fair bit before the line.......
no - it was up to the video ref to decide if he would almost certainly have scored .... but he didn't even rule on that anyway .... he ruled that chad needs to be totally ignored - hance witty should have strolled over - and thats bullsh*t!eelavation said:you're missing the point..it's not about whether you and i being certain whether he can get across the line or not, it was clearly the discretion of the video ref to decide.
eelavation said:you're missing the point..it's not about whether you and i being certain whether he can get across the line or not, it was clearly the discretion of the video ref to decide.
strider said:no - it was up to the video ref to decide if he would almost certainly have scored .... but he didn't even rule on that anyway .... he ruled that chad needs to be totally ignored - hance witty should have strolled over - and thats bullsh*t!
strider said:why the hell are we always the bloody guinea pigs for a precendent?!?!?! :crazy: :crazy:
and like i said earlier - there should be a whole lot more penalty tries if the foul committer(s) need to be ignored ..... its a very dangerous precedent
Bazal said:Attention grabbing moron...
thats not an 8 point try ... an 8pt try is only if something happens AFTER the try is scoredTizzun said:I was just watching the game and had a thought on why it took so many replays to give the Jarryd try. I think Billy was maybe thinking of giving us an 8 point try? Not that there was foul play but Witt did hold Jarryd back?
Agree totally. It's become the Bulldogs show with that git Tunks on there, and is torture to listen to, almost as bad as the continuous clown team. I just wish the ABC didn't have to cover the AFL. Hopefully the dog scum can get knocked out this weekend and we won't have to listen to any more sucking of their c**ks.Delboy said:AM I the only one that is finding Graham Hughes pro Dogs bias about everything ruining the show, from SBW to the salary cap his stand just reflects the Dogs. It is making it so difficult to listen to a sports show on the way home. he is becoming a joke in my eyes.
Somewhat rescued by MG, but Hughes is embarrassing at times, SBW should never be penalised, Corey Hughes is the best hooker in the game, and the Eels are useless, he should take some time off and consider what he does, maybe I am being critical but anyone who has me turning a sports show off does have issues.
apparently he was asking the tv broadcast for a view from the other side (the one they showed after the try was scored) and they kept putting on the wrong shot. wasn't a case of him wanting to see 400 replays, just one from the other side which they couldn't get for him. apprently had hayne not grounded the ball properly he was going to consider a penalty try.Tizzun said:I was just watching the game and had a thought on why it took so many replays to give the Jarryd try. I think Billy was maybe thinking of giving us an 8 point try? Not that there was foul play but Witt did hold Jarryd back?