Yes I believe they are first grade standard, I believe McFadden was an extremely poor coach, but if we use Kata as an example, Kata was far more than adequate last season at first grade level and showed huge gains from week 1 to week 26. Under Kearney now, I'd struggle to keep him in the side. We extend that out, Fusitua is another guy in that exact category, patches of absolute brilliance last season, awful this season. It isn't a cop out at all to say it's Kearneys job to get them ready, he has had more than enough time to improve basics in every single player in that squad, and as a collective, I'm not sure you could find more than 1-2 players that have improved over the course of the season. Daniel Anderson came in, and he made them carry around balls non stop, only a small simple thing, but made a difference. From the 1st training session, he started from scratch, teaching them how to pass and catch the ball correctly. May sound like stupid, simple things, but they improved every single player in that squad, and in the same time frame Kearney had, with a side he hadn't handpicked which is the other line trotted out about Kearney a lot, every player improved and the Warriors soared up the ladder
I can agree to a certain extent about not coming through a better development system etc, NZ junior game based on power and running over people compared to Aussie being based on skill. but some of the key players in the side have been through that, RTS, Foran, Luke to name a few, and they are a shadow of themselves now, and the 2 mentioned last are far more of the problem than guys like Afoa and Tevega. There is more than enough experience in that side to work together to cover up the new guys
The Warriors have put themselves between a rock and a hard place at the moment, and they can't win. They have sacked so many coaches that sacking another is an extremely poor look, but for many people also it is plainly obvious that Kearney is not an NRL standard coach. I wouldn't mind being proven wrong on that but it's not a statement I'm worried about making
Mentioned in another topic a few weeks back about watching a game with Frank Endacott a few weeks back, and he said the people they have looking for talent now have absolutely no idea compared to Ackland and can't argue with that when the 20s results are looked at. Heard on the radio today that Iro said to someone that in the early days of 20s, the TV exposure was a huge draw card that league had, now that union have televised school games it's harder to get guys across and I do see some merit in that