One of your best keep it upOf course they will, they don’t give a sht where they start off, only where they end up.
One of your best keep it upOf course they will, they don’t give a sht where they start off, only where they end up.
oh I willOne of your best keep it up
You know that's f**k all right?Arlc wants the bears
location is still up in the air
bears in the nrl will get 10k easy members
The deluded old fool thinks there’s 10k people in Sydney that would become members of a wa, Adelaide, Wellington, png, insert location here, bears lol.You know that's f**k all right?
Only having around 10k members would make them one of the smallest sides in the league. I mean every club that supplied their membership numbers last year had more than 10k, with Cronulla and Manly being the smallest at about 13k.
It shows a total lack of commitment to their 'location partners', and strong partnerships aren't built off a lack of commitment.Why cynical
more flexible
10k in Sydney plus whatever they can get in Perth or png etcYou know that's f**k all right?
Only having around 10k members would make them one of the smallest sides in the league. I mean every club that supplied their membership numbers last year had more than 10k, with Cronulla and Manly being the smallest at about 13k.
Why would they have any commitment to any area when that area can miss out on an nrl spaceIt shows a total lack of commitment to their 'location partners', and strong partnerships aren't built off a lack of commitment.
It also reaffirms that their target audience isn't the new market, but their old fanbase.
It's basically a bad look all round.
And what message do you think that’s sending the fans and corporates in that area?Why would they have any commitment to any area when that area can miss out on an nrl space
their commitment is to an nrl license
Make sure you don’t lose the bid or we aren’t interestedAnd what message do you think that’s sending the fans and corporates in that area?
IDK, to be honest I can believe that they could sell 10k memberships to people in Sydney, NSW, and other "heartland" markets, if they went about it the "right" way. But almost all of those memberships would be cheap ticketless memberships that exist only to cynically pump numbers up, and I'm not sure that's the sort of thing that the NRL should be encouraging.The deluded old fool thinks there’s 10k people in Sydney that would become members of a wa, Adelaide, Wellington, png, insert location here, bears lol.
@Perth RedIDK, to be honest I can believe that they could sell 10k memberships to people in Sydney, NSW, and other "heartland" markets, if they went about it the "right" way. But almost all of those memberships would be cheap ticketless memberships that exist only to cynically pump numbers up, and I'm not sure that's the sort of thing that the NRL should be encouraging.
It's definitely not the sort of thing they should be looking for in new clubs. They should be looking to build clubs capable of selling at least 15k+ season tickets or higher value memberships, and the old Bears fanbase wasn't capable of pulling those sorts of numbers in their prime, let alone these days.
The area wouldn't be the ones losing the bid though, it'd be the Bears...Make sure you don’t lose the bid or we aren’t interested
Being capable of selling roughly 10k $10-30 ticketless memberships isn't something to be proud of...
Well your mate thinks it’s stupid to suggest itBeing capable of selling roughly 10k $10-30 ticketless memberships isn't something to be proud of...
It's a pretty poor reflection on your fanbase actually.
Being connected to the Bears would hurt their draw power in Perth, and other similar expansion markets, for at least a generation or two. Which wouldn't exactly be great when the goal of a side in an expansion market should be to grow support and market share in said market, not to sacrifice some of that growth to appease some dying men on the other side of the country/Tasman.10k in Sydney plus whatever they can get in Perth or png etc
I'm not sure that I really agreed with you, and I'm presenting it as a negative even if I did.Well your mate thinks it’s stupid to suggest it
now I wanna see his response that YOU agreed with me
Anytime you agree with me is a negative for meI'm not sure that really agreed with you, and I'm presenting it as a negative even if I did.
We already know that you're intellectually dishonest, you don't have to tell us.Anytime you agree with me is a negative for me
Blah blah blahWe already know that you're intellectually dishonest, you don't have to tell us.
Tell us again how PNG, a county where 40% of the population lives under the poverty line, is going to be a giant success, but Perth and Adelaide will fail unless they commit to carrying the dead corpse of the Bears around.Blah blah blah
come and visit planet earth one day