Is it just me or does those little reviews of each teams performance each week always seem derogatory to manly, despite their performance? This week is deserved as Mnaly played fairly poorly against penrith, but it also says the Storm are at their "rightful" place at the top of the table? How is it "rightful" when they are on the same points as Manly and only ahead on differential, and lost to them a few weeks ago? And there are other examples, like last week when Manly beat them they described the storm as still too good for manly despite the loss, and other weeks thigns like "did enough to win", "matt orford is ordinary". Its annoying me every week to read this, somebody at this site is obvious biased against Manly because the b best Ive read has been something along the lines "Good win over the storm and their defence could take them all the way in 2007", great review of the team who has the best defecne in the comp, not very insightful, and saying it was a good win is also obvious as it was 1 v 2......or am I just being paranoid?
