What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Wests Tigers club news

Messages
20,749
Nothing like a civil war to get the old forum firing up.

There was an article I was reading talking about the board seeking to get some control from HBG.

And HBG not being very pleased about it.

But they went nuclear in their response.

Crushed the rebel forces.

I think that the wests v Balmain issue is not a precise way to frame it. I think it’s more to do with personalities than colours.
 
Last edited:

Tigerm

Coach
Messages
15,305

“Our focus is on stability, unity and success both on and off the field. Holman Barnes Group and the Wests Tigers share a deep commitment to the players, members, fans and communities, and we will continue to work together to build a strong, sustainable and successful long-term future for the club.
----------------
Going scorched earth, is a strange way to achieve this?
 
Messages
18,417
Oh please! What benefit is there buying a Wests Tigers membership? It's a fanclub, you don't get any voting rights. To have any voting rights, you would have had to have bought a HBG membership or Magpies FC membership over three years ago, applied to have your membership upgraded and have it approved. Not that it makes a difference, because the Wests Ashfield debenture holders control both boards and cannot be removed.

....

On this one facet the Tigers are not on its pat malone. If you buy a season ticket with the Roosters it doesn't give you voting rights either. To be able to vote you have to be a member of the "Eastern Suburbs District Rugby League Club", and from what I've heard and read over the years is very difficult to join, and has around 200 odd members. That club appoints the majority of the directors to the board of the Leagues Club.

Just saying for comparison is all.

It's quite sad that after 25 years of this joint venture, it seems like the Wests/Balmain divide still seems so prevalent to the people in power of your club that they continually play stupid games which do more harm than good.
 

Nutz

First Grade
Messages
8,977
How much would it cost to be a member of a member owned club?
Nothing. Not such a thing in what I'm proposing. The club will still be owned by someone. It's their constitution that's the key....it won't happen because of Balmain's inability to survive their mutual joint venture responsibility and Wests Ashfield will not let this slip from theur grasp.

I hate joint ventures, it's still either your a magpie or a tiger, on paper it was always going to have problems.
Until we are fully committed wests tigers without the Magpie we'll always have this us and them.
I'm not Balmain, I have to stress this, I'm Wests Tigers, have been from the start.
 
Messages
20,749
On this one facet the Tigers are not on its pat malone. If you buy a season ticket with the Roosters it doesn't give you voting rights either. To be able to vote you have to be a member of the "Eastern Suburbs District Rugby League Club", and from what I've heard and read over the years is very difficult to join, and has around 200 odd members. That club appoints the majority of the directors to the board of the Leagues Club.

Just saying for comparison is all.

It's quite sad that after 25 years of this joint venture, it seems like the Wests/Balmain divide still seems so prevalent to the people in power of your club that they continually play stupid games which do more harm than good.
Thanks for dropping into the bunker!
 

Nutz

First Grade
Messages
8,977
On this one facet the Tigers are not on its pat malone. If you buy a season ticket with the Roosters it doesn't give you voting rights either. To be able to vote you have to be a member of the "Eastern Suburbs District Rugby League Club", and from what I've heard and read over the years is very difficult to join, and has around 200 odd members. That club appoints the majority of the directors to the board of the Leagues Club.

Just saying for comparison is all.

It's quite sad that after 25 years of this joint venture, it seems like the Wests/Balmain divide still seems so prevalent to the people in power of your club that they continually play stupid games which do more harm than good.
Agree. Refer to post #1098
 

Shredder

Juniors
Messages
1,664
There is more to this than jersey color. I can feel it.
I also dont think its about bringing back the magpie either.

I reckon this was more about personalities and this was the excuse they used.

The HBG are a very successful group of business people. I really dont think they give two f**ks about the colors or the logo.

And my understanding is that the NRL license is granted to the wests tigers organization and to change color or logo would be a big deal.
 

macnaz

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
8,710
Its not a Balmain V Western Suburbs thing.
It's Western Suburbs V Balmain & Weststigers. The debenture clubwits want black and white magpie memory's only and despise comprising in any shape or form. Until thats weeded out nothing will change. Can they be weeded out? My guess no.
 

Nutz

First Grade
Messages
8,977
There is more to this than jersey color. I can feel it.
I also dont think its about bringing back the magpie either.

I reckon this was more about personalities and this was the excuse they used.

The HBG are a very successful group of business people. I really dont think they give two f**ks about the colors or the logo.

And my understanding is that the NRL license is granted to the wests tigers organization and to change color or logo would be a big deal.
Yes and no shreds.
Don't forget that HBG was formed to prop up the struggling Western Suburbs Leagues Club and even though they are the business end, their roots are magpies.
The umbrella group is huge. All they have to do is seperate football and business imo.
They are hurting their product and the NRL every time the Magpies are mentioned.
We've already embraced the name Wests and the Tiger is our emblem. The magpie imo, shouldn't even be on the sleeve. If you want to follow the Magpies they should follow KOE and pathways. If they want to follow West Tigers they watch the NRL.
 

AKA Das Hassler

Juniors
Messages
257
Its not a Balmain V Western Suburbs thing.
It's Western Suburbs V Balmain & Weststigers. The debenture clubwits want black and white magpie memory's only and despise comprising in any shape or form. Until thats weeded out nothing will change. Can they be weeded out? My guess no.

That's how I see it. Maybe Vlandys & Co need to issue a serious as cancer warning to HBG specifically identifying the issues and people destabilising the growth of WT and puting the franchise in jeopardy..."either THEY are removed or WE will do the surgery" 7 days to respond

** well there ya f**kin go....see below
 
Last edited:

Ron's_Mate

Bench
Messages
4,327
Clubs regulator puts Wests Tigers owners on notice after board sacked
By Adrian Proszenko
December 3, 2025 — 12.00pm

The state’s liquor and gaming watchdog has put the majority owners of Wests Tigers on notice following the latest boardroom dramas engulfing the club.

The Holman Barnes Group, the Tigers’ 90 per cent shareholder, has sacked four independent Wests Tigers directors including chairman Barry O’Farrell, a move that has clouded the future of chief executive Shane Richardson.

The developments have piqued the interest of Liquor & Gaming NSW, the body that sacked the Parramatta Leagues Club board in 2016 for ceasing to become an effective governing body. They were the same directors who had sat on the Parramatta Eels club board when the club was embroiled in a salary cap scandal.

“Liquor & Gaming NSW is not currently investigating any matters involving Western Suburbs Leagues Club or the Holman Barnes Group,” said a spokesperson for Liquor & Gaming NSW.

“However, we are monitoring these latest developments involving the board.

“Registered clubs must operate with the highest standards of integrity in the interests of their members as required under the Registered Clubs Act.”

Only 24 hours earlier, Inner West Council mayor Darcy Byrne, who was pivotal in securing state and federal funding for Leichhardt Oval upgrades, called for Liquor and Gaming NSW to “investigate and intervene” in the club’s administrative issues.

Pointing to the Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority’s previous investigation of disharmony and board directors being dismissed, Byrne said: “If this doesn’t demonstrate that there is a problem with governance in that organisation, then nothing will.”

The dramas come at a time when the Tigers are attempting to convince star players Jarome Luai and Jahream Bula to commit to the club long term. Sources not authorised to speak publicly have told this masthead that club powerbrokers were confident both would stay, although the situation could change after the latest string of adverse headlines.

The NRL has vowed to launch an investigation into the actions of the Holman Barnes Group after O’Farrell, Annabelle Williams, Charlie Viola and Michelle McDowell were sacked as independent directors of Wests Tigers.

They were only appointed to the board at the start of the year as part of sweeping recommendations arising from an independent review.

“We have been approached by a number of parties to look into the situation and we will,” Australian Rugby League Commission chairman Peter V’landys said. “We will look into it. I’m not saying they have done anything wrong, but naturally we are concerned.

“A number of parties have expressed concerns and we want to safeguard the Wests Tigers fans. That’s my prime aim. We are looking at it at the moment. I’m not saying we will do anything, but we’re reviewing what’s gone on …

“The people making these decisions must understand Wests Tigers fans are paramount – not politics.”

O’Farrell has labelled HBG’s actions as a “brain fart”, while Gary Barnier, the co-author of a 2023 report on the Wests Tigers’ governance which led the HBG to recruit the four independent board members in January of this year, called on the game to appoint an administrator “to protect the NRL’s ambition to be a global game”.

“As a distant observer, it seems to me there is a continued desire to bring back Wests Magpies at all costs, including the destruction of Wests Tigers if necessary,” Barnier said on Tuesday.

 

AKA Das Hassler

Juniors
Messages
257
We've already embraced the name Wests and the Tiger is our emblem. The magpie imo, shouldn't even be on the sleeve. If you want to follow the Magpies they should follow KOE and pathways. If they want to follow West Tigers they watch the NRL.

" The Tigers" is the only reason Parra wanted to merge with Balmain...they wanted to steal that!.it wasn't for any other reason. "The Tigers" features in every code of team sport across every level all over the world...it's a huge fan draw and merchandising asset we have and they just won't allow themselves to embrace it. "too much orange" you can only laugh if you dont cry
 
Last edited:

RedVee

First Grade
Messages
8,519
Yes and no shreds.
Don't forget that HBG was formed to prop up the struggling Western Suburbs Leagues Club and even though they are the business end, their roots are magpies.
The umbrella group is huge. All they have to do is seperate football and business imo.
They are hurting their product and the NRL every time the Magpies are mentioned.
We've already embraced the name Wests and the Tiger is our emblem. The magpie imo, shouldn't even be on the sleeve. If you want to follow the Magpies they should follow KOE and pathways. If they want to follow West Tigers they watch the NRL.
IMO it is more than just “too much orange”, I feel it has a bit to do with the planned redistribution of games favouring Campbelltown Stadium, and possibly the new office and pathways COE opened/opening here.

Remember 20(?) years ago the big fallout between Wests Ashfield & Wests Macarthur clubs?

Wests Ashfield (HBG) view the club as an Inner West club with the outer South West area as an unfortunate aberration.

Just IMO, I’m not involved at all thankfully. Things may have changed but I haven’t heard if they have.
 

Nutz

First Grade
Messages
8,977
IMO it is more than just “too much orange”, I feel it has a bit to do with the planned redistribution of games favouring Campbelltown Stadium, and possibly the new office and pathways COE opened/opening here.

Remember 20(?) years ago the big fallout between Wests Ashfield & Wests Macarthur clubs?

Wests Ashfield (HBG) view the club as an Inner West club with the outer South West area as an unfortunate aberration.

Just IMO, I’m not involved at all thankfully. Things may have changed but I haven’t heard if they have.
Cheers mate. Red I would forego my passionate love for my beloved Leichhardt Oval if we were never to break up the merged club and the magpie gone.
Red we could have been called the Balmain Magpies to make it a joint venture and i wouldn't have cried about that either. Over time it would have gelled for me because its one club.
If the HBG had a seperate company in their umbrella group called The Wests Tigers Leagues Club who had their own entertainment club and football club combined in an entertainment precinct, they probably would make a profit rather than propping up a joint venture that is torn apart every year by the media and the board.
 
Messages
20,749
Yes and no shreds.
Don't forget that HBG was formed to prop up the struggling Western Suburbs Leagues Club and even though they are the business end, their roots are magpies.
The umbrella group is huge. All they have to do is seperate football and business imo.
They are hurting their product and the NRL every time the Magpies are mentioned.
We've already embraced the name Wests and the Tiger is our emblem. The magpie imo, shouldn't even be on the sleeve. If you want to follow the Magpies they should follow KOE and pathways. If they want to follow West Tigers they watch the NRL.
The magpie is absolutely critical to our DNA. It’s half of the whole.

The Balmain side got the honour of the official animal.

No magpie in the mix, I’ll be hard pressed fighting on.
 

Delboy

First Grade
Messages
8,954
Cheers mate. Red I would forego my passionate love for my beloved Leichhardt Oval if we were never to break up the merged club and the magpie gone.
Red we could have been called the Balmain Magpies to make it a joint venture and i wouldn't have cried about that either. Over time it would have gelled for me because its one club.
If the HBG had a seperate company in their umbrella group called The Wests Tigers Leagues Club who had their own entertainment club and football club combined in an entertainment precinct, they probably would make a profit rather than propping up a joint venture that is torn apart every year by the media and the board.
I’m in no way a Tigers fan, but my grandson played junior reps and the strength of the Wests Tigers juniors is the Wests side of the merger. Balmain basically feeds from the other junior leagues around its boundaries, when playing at Campbelltown no matter what the name of the rep team, it’s was close to 100% Campbelltown players.
Balmain junior reps were embellished from the Eels & Panthers juniors, anyway it needs a resolution and have no idea how the financial owners can be pushed around.
 
Top