- Messages
- 154,952
I agree HJ..Fitzy is coming to retirement age anyway. He should go out on his terms..
I believe its up to the selectors to decide when some one retires
I agree HJ..Fitzy is coming to retirement age anyway. He should go out on his terms..
thanks for the ammunition
he is the devil we know, thats why some people want him gone
who has bitched about the piokie tax and smokng rules more than Denis the menace ?
in fact, has anyone made more excuses than Denis ?
who said we would be broke in 5 years ?
No one is disputing that it belongs to the members but is this the type of comment you would want from the CEO of your local club ?
I believe its up to the selectors to decide when some one retires
Bottom line is that any CEO candidate would be a candidate for a job vacancy (if/when it exists) that should be properly advertised, and they should need to be judged on merit through a robust recruitment process. We did it for our FG coach just recently, surely it would work that way for teh CEO?As such, any new CEO candidate should be looked at purely on what experience they have and what potential they display and not automatically cast aside because they do not have 30 years experience.
I have no doubt Fitzy WILL go out on his own terms, regardless of the structure of the LC Board after these elections. Fitzy by reports is on a two year annual review and contract structure, which came around in November 2008. It will be November 2010 before anything in his current contract/review can be changed, and then some time after that (min 3-6 months?) before he might trigger and three-strikes-and-out style of performance review dismissal action.I agree HJ..Fitzy is coming to retirement age anyway. He should go out on his terms..
So why not run for and get on the LC Board, Terry ;-)
Gloom and doom are knocking for Australian sport
By Rebecca Wilson
January 31, 2009 12:00am
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,24984595-5001023,00.html
the football club i think needs to be given some control over the nrl team. ovo gave a reason for why the fc don't have total control (which seemed like a reasonable explanation i just can't remember what it was) but i think it will help improve the fc membership base if the fc does have some control.
I feel the doom and gloom of 2009.... it has made me cry several times in the last 2 weeks
good to meet a few more of you today.
from what alan said the pokie tax increases are pretty much killing the clubs' profits. from memory the club's loss last year is about the same as the football grants which is about the same as the club has paid in increased pokie tax.
the habit of over-reliance on pokie revenue developed by our club over the last 15 years needs to be changed. in my view part of the club's future business plans should be to make the football club close to or non reliant on leagues club grants. the leagues club still needs to be improved to make a good revenue stream and profits like we did not all that long ago, while the fc is transformed into a solid business venture in its own right. i know the lc was set up to fund the football team but the landsccape is vastly different to when it was set up 60 years ago.
the football club i think needs to be given some control over the nrl team. ovo gave a reason for why the fc don't have total control (which seemed like a reasonable explanation i just can't remember what it was) but i think it will help improve the fc membership base if the fc does have some control.
on the membership i think some problems lie in that many people don't know that there is a difference between the fc and lc. up until hellsy's membership drive a few years ago i thought lc and fc were the same thing. the other thing is that the club needs to be pro-active in attracting members. i sent col the link to collingwood's site. they push membership heavily and i think we should be the same. like i said today, we increase membership we can increase the premium we demand from sponsors. at present we have around 600 members. i honestly think with the right marketing drive and supporter push that could be 6k+.
anyway those are just a couple of my thoughts.
thanks for organising and i was happy to see that 3p and alan were able to engage in healthy discussion and debate for the betterment of the clubs. kudos to all of you.
for anyone that's bagged ovo or questioned his motives before i can honestly say i think he has the absolute best interests of parra at heart and operates without ego.
Unfortunately, Terry will not be one of the candidates due to eligibility. Sorry Bartman.
Players (and their greedy managers pushing up the deals) have been overpaid for years now.If the money is not there, it is not there. Have a look how much super funds have dwindled in the past 12 months...
Players may have to take massive pay cuts, and find supporting jobs (Oh No!!!!) if the code is to survive in Sydney..
Maybe Denis was spot on with his prediction...I cannot guarantee the Club will exist in 5 years time....reading Rebecca Wilson's column
I stopped reading there.
Did you go and stick your head in the sand too?