And rightfully soIf the Burgess elbow had've been Fifita he'd have gotten sent and 8 weeks.
Take a look at this ... 10-15 seconds in ..
A high shot - suitably dealt with by a ref .. no real push shove bullshit from the teams they check on the players welfare and are happy that it is dealt with appropriately.
back when refs had balls - and ability
No, not a chance. He'd be unlucky to get 10 in the bin. On report and dealt with later, because the refs can't make a f**king call on the spot, even an obvious one.Looks like les davidson I believe. He knew he was gone and started walk8ng as soon as he got up.
These days with big money comes big egos. I seriously wonder if we saw that tackle today would he be sent?
He's right and TBH we used to cop the same rubbish for years.Dan ginnane summed it up well today when he said something along the lines of everyone knows George Burgess should have been sent and suspended for longer then 2 weeks but because it was against Newcastle on Saturday afternoon no one bats an eye lid over it. If that was against the broncos on Friday night he would have been sent and be facing 6-8 weeks
Dan ginnane summed it up well today when he said something along the lines of everyone knows George Burgess should have been sent and suspended for longer then 2 weeks but because it was against Newcastle on Saturday afternoon no one bats an eye lid over it. If that was against the broncos on Friday night he would have been sent and be facing 6-8 weeks
Gus Gould was asked this week about the Sia Soliola's high shot on Billy Slater and why players don't get sent off anymore. He stated 20 years ago when a player was sent off the team would make do with what they had and could still be in the contest. But in the modern game now if a player gets sent off you can virtually write off the game for the team who is a man down.
So there you have it.