When was the last time Knight's were #1 on the table?

[ArturiusX]

Round 25 of 2002 from memory, we're there any after?

 

[RABK]

After rounds 2 and 3 this year we were number 1.

 

[knights_2006]

All I know is it feels good to be on top!

 

[Stuzmeister]

It certainly does.

 

[Doctor]

I don't like it. I would much prefer to sit back a few notches, perhaps at position three or four. There isn't as much attention of on you then. Look at the Cowboys -- the minute they knew that people were watching them they capitulated to three losses. The same happened to the Storm. Believe me, being at the top of the table is great. But sitting back slightly feels a little safer. Less expectation and more room to build your season towards maximum performance in September/October. Minor premiers don't usually become major premiers... Roosters, Parra (01 and 05), Manly, etc are all cases in point.

 

[IanG]

I also remember that we were #1 on the ladder after Round 1 in 1994.

 

[Roy]

do we want to be in the top 2 at the end of the year, we have the bye the last round. Then if we are in the top 2 you would think we would win so the next week we would have a "bye to. Thats 1 game in three weeks not what you want come finals time imo.

 

[RABK]

I started a thread on such a possible occurence.

Probably a couple of pages back now.

 

[ArturiusX]

do we want to be in the top 2 at the end of the year, we have the bye the last round. Then if we are in the top 2 you would think we would win so the next week we would have a "bye to. Thats 1 game in three weeks not what you want come finals time imo.

Just because the dragons sucked ass doesn't mean the Knights will with a double bye.

 

[chinorocks]

Still not an ideal preperation for a Grand final qualifier IMO.

One bye - Fine, it will help with minor injuries etc.

Two byes - Bad. Possibly rob team of form, see them come out very stiff if that makes sense...

 

[Medievalknight]

All I know is it feels good to be on top!

It usually does