Who is our better option at half?

[panthersballboy]

I can understand why people think Noddy should be there as he has proven he can play well in the green and gold. But playing for Australia should be a reward for playing well for your club and Gower has Kimmorley well and truly covered in this department. Gower has played 4 games this year for the kangaroos. In 2 of those he has been average but the other 2 he has been one of the best players on the park (the anzac test and the 2nd game against NZ). Give him a bit more of a chance and he will prove the doubters wrong.

 

[Phillips]

Matt Orford

 

[nat]

Matt Orford

i agree definately matt orford

 

[Shifty]

Gower played well in the second half of the second game against New Zealand. He has played below average or poor in every other rep game he has been in, including the first half of that game. He is great at club level, even if he doesn't step up for the finals, but he just doesn't cut it at rep level.

One of the best players in the Anzac Test.:lol: :lol:

If playing for Australia is reward for playing well for your club then Orford should be there on consistency or Sherwin on performance in big matches.

 

[lockyno1]

One of the best players in the Anzac Test.

Only behind about 10! Geez he was not even in calculations in terms of players of the match! :roll:

 

[Special K]

If playing for Australia was based on form Gower and Kimmorley would be at home playing playstation :?

 

[panthersballboy]

In the anzac test he and lockyer were the best 2 players on the park and the commentators said so as well. Now I know there not the best judges but I would take their opinion over you blokes.

 

[God-King Dean]

Barrett/Lockyer

I want to see Orford at halfback but since that ain't gonna happen
Hill/Kimmorley