perverse
Referee
- Messages
- 27,533
Here is my feel on the subject:
ASADA don't have enough to pin the players themslves. They have informed the Sharks about what they do know in hope that the Sharks would take action and/or draw these players out. The Sharks have reacted to said information as they have.
My reasoning is that if ASADA had enough evidence on the players themselves, they wouldn't be playing this ridiculous game of cat and mouse in the media. Players would already be banned. The investigation seems to centre around Dank, and to the best of my knowledge he has had zero to do with our club. Whether individual players have sought him out or not is irrelevant to our stance on it as a club, and we should rightly back our players before we back circumstantial evidence from a 3rd party. In the Sharks case - ASADA can probably say look, we know Dank was using this, we know he had supply, we know he was working for you at the time... whatever evidence they do have. I doubt they have such a case on us.
All circumstantial at best, but I just cannot imagine why players heads arn't already rolling if they actually had some real evidence.
ASADA don't have enough to pin the players themslves. They have informed the Sharks about what they do know in hope that the Sharks would take action and/or draw these players out. The Sharks have reacted to said information as they have.
My reasoning is that if ASADA had enough evidence on the players themselves, they wouldn't be playing this ridiculous game of cat and mouse in the media. Players would already be banned. The investigation seems to centre around Dank, and to the best of my knowledge he has had zero to do with our club. Whether individual players have sought him out or not is irrelevant to our stance on it as a club, and we should rightly back our players before we back circumstantial evidence from a 3rd party. In the Sharks case - ASADA can probably say look, we know Dank was using this, we know he had supply, we know he was working for you at the time... whatever evidence they do have. I doubt they have such a case on us.
All circumstantial at best, but I just cannot imagine why players heads arn't already rolling if they actually had some real evidence.