Shifty said:
The problem with blaming people rather than identifying the real cause of these issues is that people are far less likely to respond to advice if you point the finger at them.
Do you think blaming the child's parents is going to achieve anything? The emphasis has to be on education to make people stop and think before anything happens, dealing blame at victims is not going to make them any more aware of the risks. Isn't that what you're trying to achieve?
Attaching some blame to the child's parents willeducate other parents not to allow their young children to wander the streets and place themselves in a vulnerable position.
I totally agree that NO MEANS NO. No arguments from me at all on that point.
I have been in a position where I have been able to look at the faces on 12 people sitting on a Jury during a trial for sexual assault. I have seen this a number of times. I can tell you that the looks on their faces when the defence barrister starts casting dispersion on the woman's moral standards is quite amazing. I can also tell you that it is the conservative middle age women on the jury that come up with the worst looks of distaste. I believe that is a reflection of society's attitude to people that act with low moral regard.
People should also note that it is not just women that get raped. I haven't got any figures to quote, but from personal experience ( and no smart arse comments needed ) I think young boys fall victim of pedophilia more than young girls. Unfortunately 5 and 6 year old kids don't have the luxury of saying no.
When you see the dead body of a two year old boy that has been sexually assaulted, suffocated and run over by a car, I'm sorry, but you just don't have quite as much sympathy for someone that has put themselves in a position to be sexually assaulted by their own stupidity.
Once again for the slow ones, no does mean no, and no person deserves to be sexually assaulted under any circumstances.