According to todays telegraph, smith was quoted saying
"Michael proved on a number of occasions that he has a good head for the pressure of NRL football, He is a smart kid but he does know he has a lot of work to do on his game. I think in the early season atleast our preference is for him to develop some more before we put him back there again. We feel that later in the year we will have a clearer picture of whether to paly dykes and witt or dykes OR witt"
I support smith here, I am all for young witt to play some more in PL and hone his skills, remember he was thrust into first grade well before BS would have liked but he did the job remarkably well.
Also starting him in the PL will remove some of the focus off him. I would hate to see him bogged down by expectations and play under pressure to perform.
"Michael proved on a number of occasions that he has a good head for the pressure of NRL football, He is a smart kid but he does know he has a lot of work to do on his game. I think in the early season atleast our preference is for him to develop some more before we put him back there again. We feel that later in the year we will have a clearer picture of whether to paly dykes and witt or dykes OR witt"
I support smith here, I am all for young witt to play some more in PL and hone his skills, remember he was thrust into first grade well before BS would have liked but he did the job remarkably well.
Also starting him in the PL will remove some of the focus off him. I would hate to see him bogged down by expectations and play under pressure to perform.