blacksafake
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,991
While we are talking about Doust,Why in the world we he even be meeting with the "Mouth" Mundine re entertaining any talk of a comeback.Why encourage him.His sort of publicity imo we can do without.
While we are talking about Doust,Why in the world we he even be meeting with the "Mouth" Mundine re entertaining any talk of a comeback.Why encourage him.His sort of publicity imo we can do without.
There are many examples of CEO's sitting on boards as well as them merely reporting to Boards.In my (not necessarily vast) experience a CEO sitting on a board is the norm.
It's the way that the day to day operations have representation at board level.
While we are talking about Doust,Why in the world we he even be meeting with the "Mouth" Mundine re entertaining any talk of a comeback.Why encourage him.His sort of publicity imo we can do without.
Because Mundine would fit the criteria Millward is trying to move away from - cheap, past his best etc.While we are talking about Doust,Why in the world we he even be meeting with the "Mouth" Mundine re entertaining any talk of a comeback.Why encourage him.His sort of publicity imo we can do without.
This in its entirety is correct, until we are sold to a company or partnership with proven success,nothing will change..We need to rid ourselves of this toxic culture that just keeps regenerating year after year..A CEO being on the Board of Dirrctors is not an issue and it is actually quite common in the business world.
The issue is simple. Our CEO is not judged on performance. We do not have a performance based culture for the back office (nor on the field interestingly enough).
There has been no CEO in the history of business that would survive in the role if it was based on the performance of Doust (unless it was a family business which could accept mediocrity - think of it as a bit like having to invite Uncle Frank to Christmas lunch every year - all the family think he is a bumbling fool who steals leftovers and makes crude remarks but still we don't know how to not invite the guy as he is after all, still family).
Our club is clearly suffering from an in-bred and paternal culture and that is why there is no accountability at either the Board or CEO level. Doust is not judged on any meaningful commercial based metrics or KPI's.
The impact of this isolationist strategy is a club on the verge of collapse. The NRL has, for now, avoided a full collapse.
Only a buyer with strong commercial acumen and governance can save us now. It should be very clear to anyone who follows the club closely, watches decisions being made and who has half a business brain that there will be no actual structural or governance change until a buyer assumes voting control over the Board and the football operations.
Aa a brand, its been bitch slapped, ridiculed and humilated.A CEO being on the Board of Dirrctors is not an issue and it is actually quite common in the business world.
The issue is simple. Our CEO is not judged on performance. We do not have a performance based culture for the back office (nor on the field interestingly enough).
There has been no CEO in the history of business that would survive in the role if it was based on the performance of Doust (unless it was a family business which could accept mediocrity - think of it as a bit like having to invite Uncle Frank to Christmas lunch every year - all the family think he is a bumbling fool who steals leftovers and makes crude remarks but still we don't know how to not invite the guy as he is after all, still family).
Our club is clearly suffering from an in-bred and paternal culture and that is why there is no accountability at either the Board or CEO level. Doust is not judged on any meaningful commercial based metrics or KPI's.
The impact of this isolationist strategy is a club on the verge of collapse. The NRL has, for now, avoided a full collapse.
Only a buyer with strong commercial acumen and governance can save us now. It should be very clear to anyone who follows the club closely, watches decisions being made and who has half a business brain that there will be no actual structural or governance change until a buyer assumes voting control over the Board and the football operations.
It is time for change - everyone external to these supposed leaders know.Aa a brand, its been bitch slapped, ridiculed and humilated.
Peter Doust is a f**king joke, alongside McGregor both are big con men.
Even with Hunt and Graham coming we are nothing.
About bloody time you can thank Him for the situation the dragons are inSack the person who is the real problem at the club Sean O'Connor.
Yes,accountability is the way to go. The only problem with that is there is no one to account too. The Board & Administration are all corrupt. They all have their snouts in the trough. Covering one another's arse.There needs to be accountability