Frank Facer
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,069
Now watch and listen to what the great Sachin Tendulkar had to say about ball tampering.
All I got was a black screen Frank. Is there a link? Trust me the Indians were relying on Smith and Warner to play IPL. The amount of money these two bring to the international stage is unfathomable. Perhaps not as much $$$ that the yank athletes get but still big money. I still believe the ban was warranted. Half Kiwi/ half Oz. It was the clean up that cricket needed. They'll rebuild but it shows the rest of the world that we don't condone cheating. Hopefully it rubs off on other teams. Nothing left to say on the matter.Now watch and listen to what the great Sachin Tendulkar had to say about ball tampering.
He is and always was a dick head.Admittedly it's been a very long while since I studied media law, but has anyone considered that Warner's non commital answers were tempered by legal advice?
That is, if he dared allude to other individuals' involvement- or God forbid, mention specific names - possible class action could result.
Yes, Warner's answers were scripted and unsatisfactory, however he 'might' have his hands tied to some degree.
Warner is one of the best openers to ever play for Australia. He is a match winner. He can destroy opposition attacks single handedly . He is probably the best attacking opener I have ever seen play for Australia. He is the second best Australian batsman right now and only behind Smith who is the second best test batsman in cricket history. Only 11 other batsman in world cricket have retired with better test average at opener than Warner.He is and always was a dick head.
How he ever got 2IC in the test team is beyond me.
CC
I'd be bloody surprised if he went down that road tbh. If his answers to the journos were disingenuous much like Smith's and Bancroft's, I'll slash my ankles and die a slow death. All scripted, crocodile tears with the exception of Bancroft, same old script without the tears. Sutherland needs to go too.Admittedly it's been a very long while since I studied media law, but has anyone considered that Warner's non commital answers were tempered by legal advice?
That is, if he dared allude to other individuals' involvement- or God forbid, mention specific names - possible class action could result.
Yes, Warner's answers were scripted and unsatisfactory, however he 'might' have his hands tied to some degree.
Do you agree he is a dickhead or not.Warner is one of the best openers to ever play for Australia. He is a match winner. He can destroy opposition attacks single handedly . He is probably the best attacking opener I have ever seen play for Australia. He is the second best Australian batsman right now and only behind Smith who is the second best test batsman in cricket history. Only 11 other batsman in world cricket have retired with better test average at opener than Warner.
Don't agree at all.He is and always was a dick head.
How he ever got 2IC in the test team is beyond me.
CC
No he is not.Do you agree he is a dickhead or not.
CC
Agree.Friggin Pedophiles within the churches have got off with far less for ball tampering than these 3 blokes. Sure it was a dump decision to cheat in a game, but it's not criminal! Reality check urgently needed!
Ned Kelly was a murderer and a criminal.Agree.
So much hysteria, it's hysterical!
Anyone would think Ned Kelly wasn't a national icon.
I don't know him personally to make personal comments.Do you agree he is a dickhead or not.
CC
Or, he and his family were oppressed and he shot in self defence.Ned Kelly was a murderer and a criminal.
Probably, but still cherished... for doing much worse than what a few of our cricketers did.Ned Kelly was a murderer and a criminal.
Yes, I like your version.Or, he and his family were oppressed and he shot in self defence.
Depends whether you are a romantacist or a realistOr, he and his family were oppressed and he shot in self defence.
Well your point of view is different to a number of current historians and lawyers. These include people that would consider themselves realists, and not swayed by emotions or prejudice.Depends whether you are a romantacist or a realist
Reality says a lot of people were oppressed and never robbed a bank or shot anyone.
Kelly built a metal helmet and a metal chest plate so if you think that was for self defence rather than protection for the imminent trouble you were going to get in for the actions you were about to undertake then I believe you have a stilted view of history.