NRL records $2.6m loss for 2016 despite improved non-broadcast income
The crucial question asked by rebelling NRL clubs - where has the money gone? - was answered at Rugby League Central on Monday when financial reports for 2016 were revealed.
The NRL recorded a $2.6 million loss, despite growing non-broadcast income by 12 per cent on the previous year and stabilising administrative costs.
Almost all the gains in revenue generated by headquarters have gone to the clubs.
The NRL figures represent a clear challenge to the clubs - grow your own income from gates, sponsorships, memberships and the sale of merchandise.
NRL income from these sources grew from $129.3m in 2015 to $144.2m, while broadcast income, spread over a five-year cycle, was stable.
Non-broadcast income could have almost reached $150m but for the $4.5m loss in ticket sales from the dead State of Origin rubber in Sydney.
While the NRL reduced its deficit in 2016, this does not include the losses of the two clubs it controls - the Newcastle Knights and Gold Coast Titans.
Their losses increase the deficit to $8.6m.
Club bosses seeking governance reform of the ARLC often ask where $2.5b has been spent since the ARLC came to power five years ago.
The answer is that the accurate revenue figure is $1.6b and 60 per cent of this has gone to the players and clubs in annual distributions.
NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg said: "These results show we have invested a majority of revenue, both broadcast and non-broadcast, back into clubs and grassroots football.
"Over the next few years, clubs and players will receive more revenue than ever before – and we will be investing more funds into grassroots."
For every $3 spent by the NRL on players and clubs, it spends $1 on grassroots development of the code, while clubs, such as the Raiders and Bulldogs, add to this via their licensed clubs.
Total revenue to the NRL plus clubs in 2016 was $582m, with the NRL contributing $375mand the 16 clubs $207m.
The AFL total income averages $900m a year, with headquarters and the 18 AFL clubs contributing half each.
Despite the comparatively poor revenue-raising capacity of NRL clubs, which is the the legacy of living off poker machines for 60 years, headquarters has $134m in the bank.
This will drop by $80m next accounting period as a result of a prepayment by Channel Nine of $55m and a recategorisation of assets.
However, this "future fund" compares favourably with the AFL cash balance of $55m in 2016, down from a forecast of $80m.
While NRL administration costs rose 4 per cent to $21.5m, they generated the 12 per cent increase in non-broadcast revenue of $144.2m.
However, this increase in yield will not placate the clubs seeking to put a cost-cutting scythe through RL Central, particularly with Greenberg foreshadowing increases in funds spent on digital production and integrity issues.
Greenberg said: "We will also invest in our digital and integrity operations which are so important to the future of the game.
"With the new television rights deal secured ($1.9b over five years), we will now look to generate maximum funds from commercial activities – and invest them in all levels of the game from grassroots to the elite."
Greenberg said the increased digital spend would come from the NRL ending its outsourcing agreement with Telstra and providing its own content.
Increases in the allocation to the Integrity Department will be devoted to issues surrounding wagering, illicit drug use and salary cap surveillance.
Clubs and states now receive 92 per cent of broadcast revenue but this will be reviewed by the end of the season to correspond with a new Collective Bargaining Agreement with the Rugby League Players Association, to coincide with the new TV deal.
In 2016, clubs received $160.2m in grants and the states received $30.5m.
With NRL clubs spending far in excess of the annual grant, a soft cap on football department spending is inevitable.
A cap on spending, such as the hiring of more assistant coaches, together with a drive to increase non-broadcast revenue, will solve rugby league's financial problems and validate the view there is more upside in the code than in any other professional sport.
media were briefed, reported by the aus, afr, tele & smh.Dropping this in here from the Knights thread as it is relative to the ARLC's performance. In summary NRL lost $2.6million in its operations and a further $6million bailing out clubs last year.
I wonder how Roy got the numbers. Clubs leaking or NRL selective release I wonder?
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...oved-nonbroadcast-income-20170213-gubrqo.html
NRL registers surprise $140 million windfall
THE National Rugby League has shaken off a year of salary cap and player misbehaviour scandals to register a surprise $140 million windfall in “non-broadcast revenue”, as it found lucrative new ways to make money beyond its $2 billion TV rights deal.
The boom result was driven by a 50 per cent jump in sponsorship revenues to $43m in 2016, as the code announced new or upgraded contracts for major corporate partners Sportsbet, KFC, Hankook Tyres, Treasury Wines, P & O Cruises and Coates Hire.
It can also be revealed that the sponsorship jump softened the blow of an unexpected rise in costs caused by the scandals of the 2016 season, according to a copy of the NRL’s financial results for the year to October 2016 obtained by The Daily Telegraph.
The code was forced to spend a record $3.2 million on policing integrity and salary cap issues, mainly because of its months-long investigation into the Parramatta Eels’ salary cap scandal broken open by the Telegraph in March last year.
The sponsorship boom was the driving force behind a rise in the NRL’s total revenue by nearly $20m to nearly $354m.
The impetus for the rise in the NRL’s 2016 sponsorship revenue appears to have been the renewal of the NRL’s betting rights.
NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg told the Daily Telegraph growing sponsorship revenues have become a key focus of the code: “With the TV rights deal secured, we are now focusing on driving non-broadcast revenue. And that means working to increase corporate involvement in the game.”
Early last year, Sportsbet upgraded its contract as the NRL’s official wagering partner, worth as much as $60 million over four years.
However, the $43m the NRL makes from sponsorship lags what the AFL makes from corporate partners. While the AFL has not yet released its 2016 results, in 2015 it is understood to have made between $70m and $90m from sponsorships.
The results also show that the NRL was forced to dip into its $134 million of cash reserves during 2016 — recording a $2.6 million deficit for the year.
However, that comes after the NRL distributed $184m to the clubs for the year to October 2016. It is understood individual clubs received a range of between $11m and $12m each during the year, a figure that included a $1.5m distribution that was given following the signing of the TV rights deal with Nine.
The NRL’s cash reserves had been boosted by a $50m cash advance from the Nine Network towards its free-to-air TV rights deal through to the end of 2022.
The $184m paid to the clubs did not include the money ploughed into the NRL-owned Gold Coast Titans and Newcastle Knights to keep them operational. It is understood that each club was given a $3m subsidy during 2016.
Greenberg said: “It is crucial that we provide them with the funding to be strong and stable.”
Club distributions will be boosted further in the future, after League chairman John Grant caved in late last year and offered them a lucrative deal from 2018 onwards in order to save his position. The NRL will report a deficit once again for at least this year.
There was a blowout in operating expenditure, which rose by more than $5 million to $133 million. This was due largely to investment in technology, mainly the NRL’s controversial bunker, which cost between $2-3 million
and the AFR had a piece too http://www.afr.com/business/sport/n...d-ditches-investment-managers-20170213-gubk4w
Can anyone cut and paste this?
you'll bitch and moan no matter how good it isI hope we are getting some good digital sht for $100mill !!
Thanks, jeez these guys sound like the WA Liberals!
So much for Smith's plan to put some aside for a rainy day.
I hope we are getting some good digital sht for $100mill !!
Im confused... Is the NRL spending the money quicker than they can earn it, or are the evil clubs to blame?
Maybe a couple of the NRL paid stooges can drop by and set me straight...
please just f**k off and stick to AFLIt's good spin, they've had an extra $16mill revenue plus a $50mill advance and still lost $8.6mill! But apparently Greenburg has got spending under control by streamlining nrlhq
Im confused... Is the NRL spending the money quicker than they can earn it, or are the evil clubs to blame?
Maybe a couple of the NRL paid stooges can drop by and set me straight...