robbo74 said:
PLEASE where r they going to fit him in ta cap. Lets be real for a minute they r saying they can't keep there lock but can buy him. How would Luke feel. One thing about Manly is they will do anything to win a comp but expect loyality from there players. Look at what they do to there best (Paul Vautin) was sh*t on an so on and so on.
oh my god
you are ridiculous
"manly will do anything to win the comp"? implying what exactly, that they sign off-contract players? sign players released from their clubs? EVERY CLUB SIGNS PLAYERS FROM OTHER CLUBS! get over it you losers. they havent signed creah and i dont expect them to its a rumour, obviously they cant afford him if, like you implied, they cant afford to keep willo....but IF they did sign creah then so what it would obviously be legit he'd be either released from his contract or offc ontract so who cares what they do? you dont see canberra complaining about st georges 'immorality' because they signed woolford....and i dont see how you can imply manly are disloyal they keep as many of there players as they can they WANT to keep willo but may not because they have already spent the cap, they re-signed glenn hall after giving a bascially nothing player his chance, they expect to re-sign georgie rose despite his broken leg meaning he hasnt played in months AND the fact that rose knocked back there initial offer to chase more money greedily, yet manly are trying to stay loyal to him despite this...everything you said about manly is wrong, and what you say holds no credibility partyl because of sentences that make no sense such as "Look at what they do to there best (Paul Vautin)
was sh*t on an so on and so on" perhaps it should look more like this: "Look at what they have done to
their best (Paul Vautin)........" after that you idiocy makes a translation impossible
you sir are a #$%^&*(. game over
ps: to non-idiots out there am i allowed to call him a #$%^&*( without having to sensor it next time? im not sue about the rules there
