What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Breaking: Assault charges against Radradra withdrawn

Generalzod

Immortal
Messages
32,102
Extraordinary. Race him back into the test team Mal!

Or maybe for Feej?


NRL star Semi Radradra faces court on domestic violence charges

CHRIS HOOK, The Daily Telegraph
4 minutes ago
THE prosecution in the domestic violence case against Eels star Semi Radradra has withdrawn both charges after an intense morning which involved his former partner being cross-examined.

The court adjourned for lunch a short time ago before the prosecution dropped the case entirely.

An apprehended violence order against Radradra has also been dropped.

It means Radradra will likely be free to continue playing for Parramatta for the rest of 2017 before heading overseas to pursue a French rugby contract.

In February, Ms Ting, the mother of Radradra’s two year old daughter, gave evidence that Radradra had abused her physically, emotionally and financially.

Ms Ting continued to give evidence this morning under intense questioning by Radradra’s defence lawyer Murugan Thangaraj SC.

Ms Ting admitted to sending a text message to a friend saying she wished she had someone to assist her to “heat up the media”.

The text was sent nine days before Ms Ting went to police to make claims of domestic assault against Radradra for the first time.

36b376f69d25d93ec723982714e59141

Radradra’s former partner Perina Ting has given evidence against the Eels star. Picture: Peter Kelly
In further questioning Ms Ting admitted giving an interview to a Sydney Morning Herald journalist about the possibility of Radrara leaving Parramatta days before she went to police and then another interview to the same journalist about the charges, allowing that journalist to break the story.

“You had a plan and part of your strategy was to heat the media,” Mr Thangaraj said.

“Yes sir because at that time I heard a lot of stories from friends about people putting me down,” Ms Ting said.

She said she had been put in contact with the Herald journalist friend and NRL player manager Mario Tartak — who was also a friend of Radradra’s.

In other evidence, Ms Ting gave said there were conflicts between her and Radradra’s family around issues such as herbal remedies for her baby daughter during a trip to Fiji.

She also said that on one occasion she had used vouchers lying around the house to get to Fiji because Radradra would not pay for her to accompany him and their daughter.

5600fccbf60cce1f722ceddb87dc9581

Semi Radradra in action for the Eels at the weekend.
Mr Thangaraj told Ms Ting she resented Radradra’s support of his family, such as buying his parents a house, paying for a car, paying medical bills and school fees for relatives as well as giving them cash when they needed it.

“Because Semi was giving so many people so much money you told the police a number of times he had financial problems,” Mr Thangaraj said.

“Every time Semi came back from Fiji we had financial problems,” Ms Ting agreed.

Earlier, Ms Ting was asked how afraid of Semi Radradra she was after the alleged second assault incident. In evidence previously tendered to the court Ms Ting said she hid in the bathroom but later left to get ice.

“Because he had called the pastor ... he had already punched me,” Ms Ting said.

Mr Thangaraj also raised questions about the state of the phone that was thrown against the wall before moving on to quiz Ms Ting about the third charge of assault and whether she was sitting or standing when she was allegedly pushed.

5661ca025aa04136b2955889c5ce459b

Semi Radradra arriving at Parramatta Court this morning. Picture: Peter Kelly
Mr Thangaraj said that Ms Ting’s evidence in February that she had been pinned against a wall had not been mentioned in interviews with police. He asked her if she had been told to give that evidence.

“Did someone tell you to say that,” Mr Thangaraj asked

“No sir, I thought being pinned against the wall means pushed,” Ms Ting replied.

Mr Thangaraj then moved on to financial questions, linking Ms Ting’s texts to Radradra threatening to go to police to questions around Radradra’s support of her.

“You told the club that if you did not get more money from Semi you would have to do something,” Mr Thangaraj said.

“I was not asking for more money just what he was supposed to pay ... the $300 not $250,” Ms Ting said.

“To do something, yes, to get the child support,” she said after further questioning.
Anyway we live in a system where women are believed more than men, makes a mockery of the whole court system.
 

T-Boon

Coach
Messages
15,325
Who is this scum agent that helped her heat up the media. Benji's agent?

That agent should be black listed by the players.
 

T-Boon

Coach
Messages
15,325
So telegraph says player agent Mario Tartak helped Semi's ex apply heat to Semi in the media.

Anyone know who his players are?
 

T-Boon

Coach
Messages
15,325

For various reasons, including political reasons, the police always tend to believe the female complainant. Even when there isn't a lot of evidence (such as his word against hers). Where they might not charge if it was an ordinary act of V (because of lack of E) put the D in front of the V and they will definitely charge. Partly to protect themselves if something escalates. If they don't know...just charge. Then its on the Court.
The big problem is the stigma that comes with just being charged. If the media were more responsible in their reporting (like wait till there is a conviction) it wouldn't be so bad. But famous DV's are media gold.
 

Bronco18

Juniors
Messages
1,071
For various reasons, including political reasons, the police always tend to believe the female complainant. Even when there isn't a lot of evidence (such as his word against hers). Where they might not charge if it was an ordinary act of V (because of lack of E) put the D in front of the V and they will definitely charge. Partly to protect themselves if something escalates. If they don't know...just charge. Then its on the Court.
The big problem is the stigma that comes with just being charged. If the media were more responsible in their reporting (like wait till there is a conviction) it wouldn't be so bad. But famous DV's are media gold.

So... is the system the media or the courts or the police? Or all of the above? I'm confused, this thesis is getting pretty broad.

I'll agree that the media could definately report on these issues more honestly, and in many cases could be more respectful of the accused.

This can go both ways, however. The criminal justice system finds people "guilty" and "not guilty", not "guilty" and "innocent", despite popular misconceptions. Look through any NRL related news post on Facebook related to the charges against Radradra being dropped, many armchair experts assume because the case didn't proceed, his partner maliciously fabricated these claims. Just because the accused can't be found guilty to the required criminal standard (beyond reasonable doubt - a very high one, and justifiably so), doesn't necessarily mean that the claims against them are false. As you mentioned, such is the nature of domestic violence, evidence often turns on "he said/she said" scenarios. Good luck getting an abused partner into court if an unsuccessful claim automatically makes you a grossly defamatory liar.
 

T-Boon

Coach
Messages
15,325
So... is the system the media or the courts or the police? Or all of the above? I'm confused, this thesis is getting pretty broad.

The guy said "we live in a system" so I think he is talking about the whole set up of society now. Not just the Courts. I think he means the media, the power of the femmo, politicians living in fear of the femmo, the judges on social media telling everyone whats "not ok", women seeing victimhood as hero status ...The police are who I am talking about obviously.

You could just keep this to Rugby League and say 3 out of the last 4 cases that have been brought by the police against RL players the courts (in this case the prosecutor) have pretty emphatically said the woman in a liar. The police shouldn't have believed the woman. Who knows if she has made it ALL up, but she has been caught in numerous lies and has obvious ulterior motives using DV as a sword rather than a shield.

The other one, Kenny, the judge basically said "this is nothing" doesn't belong here.

Bottom line is, it is starting to look like when it comes to RL players women lie more than the men hit. It is not OK.
 
Last edited:

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
151,041
So is he saying he didn't hit her? Or is he (his lawyers) arguing that she didn't follow the correct process?

He always denied it.

Under cross examination by Semi's QC her story of the events changed and she admitted to lying (about what we dont know) and the police prosecutors decided she was not a credible witness and so they dropped the charges.
 

POPEYE

Coach
Messages
11,397
Good to see Semi doing the right thing by the Eels . . . temporarily . . . had the flow-on he was hoping for
 

Bronco18

Juniors
Messages
1,071
You could just keep this to Rugby League and say 3 out of the last 4 cases that have been brought by the police against RL players the courts (in this case the prosecutor) have pretty emphatically said the woman in a liar. The police shouldn't have believed the woman. Who knows if she has made it ALL up, but she has been caught in numerous lies and has obvious ulterior motives using DV as a sword rather than a shield.

The other one, Kenny, the judge basically said "this is nothing" doesn't belong here.

Bottom line is, it is starting to look like when it comes to RL players women lie more than the men hit. It is not OK.

You contradict yourself a bit here, there's literally no way of knowing how many of these cases are true. For mine, it's certainly conceivable that an abused partner would want to seek revenge in a method we'd deem immoral (through the media). Lying about it to cover her tracks too is conceivable but the lies certainly undermine her credibility as a witness and quite justifiably wouldn't lead to a conviction.

But if you're saying the police then bear the blame for bringing this to court, remember Ting folded in cross examination here, which is when she proved her unreliability as a witness. This could well be the first that the prosecution knew of this, and sure enough, after it was revealed to the court, they withdrew the case against Radradra.

The whole "prosecution being part of some anti-men agenda" argument is conspiratorial bollocks.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top