Firey_Dragon
Coach
- Messages
- 12,099
The video game industry usually scores games on a scale of 8-10. Anything below that is usually not very good. 75 is a bad score on the usual scale. 80 is around 'average'. Anything above 85-90 metacritic is usually a good to great game.I love Mass Effect so was always going to play this regardless of what any critic wants to say. That doesn't change the fact that a 75 isn't a bad score. So what if it's not some critically acclaimed masterpiece that fanboys are going to joke themselves off too until something else comes around and tops it? Doesn't mean it won't be an enjoyable experience.
I'm a huge fan of the originals, I've played andromeda for 10 hours. It wasn't an enjoyable experience. None of the characters are compelling which made the typical mass effect storyline cheese enjoyable. Combat is arguably better, but the auto-cover is janky as hell. The loadout and skill system is garbage though. It plays more like Dragon Age than Mass Effect which I was never a fan of. Conversations also appear to carry no weight like they used to in ME.
There are so many good RPG's that have come out recently, I can't see why, even with it's heritage why someone would invest any real time into Mass Effect over the others. Zelda, Horizon, Nioh and Nier Automata have all released in the last month or so. All of which are 10 points or more better on metacritic.
Last edited: