Non Footy Chat Thread II

[Poupou Escobar]

Better than a f**ktard

 

[T.S Quint]

Didn't you know? The war changed him so much he became a bow and arrow toting member of the Avengers who will straight up murder bad guys. Probably because he has no super powers and feels quite a bit of subconscious inadequacy when he fights alongside the actual god of thunder.

All this and he still found time to become the last of the Mohicans!

 

[Gary Gutful]

Hopefully we have seen the last of the Mohicans. So outdated these days:

 

[T.S Quint]

Hopefully we have seen the last of the Mohicans. So outdated these days:

View attachment 15619

It'll come back.
It always does.

 

[Hollywood Jesus]

*edit*

Won't post my pic. Stupid forums.

 

[strider]

Yeah, stupid forums ...

 

[Gary Gutful]

I think this is what he wanted to post:

 

[Twizzle]

'Marriage' deemed offensive by UNSW lecturers

Updated: 7:58 am, Tuesday, 26 September 2017

One of the country's top universities has warned maths students not to use the term 'marriage' when referring to a well-known theorem because the word may cause 'offence.'

The theorem was proved by Phillip Hall in 1935 and relies on the standard example of matchmaking men and women to represent two distinct sets.

The move by the University of New South Wales comes as student groups clash on campuses around the country on same sex marriage.

UNSW honours student Sean Lynch told Sky News that his lecturer asked students not to refer to the theorem as Hall's Marriage Theorem in an assignment.

'The reason why was because the canonical example has homophobic implications, at least in (lecturer Catherine Greenhill's) eyes,' Mr Lynch said.

He says that while same sex marriage was never explicitly mentioned, it's clear what staff members were referring to.

Senior lecturer and UNSW academic advisor, Dr Thomas Britz, says the advice was inappropriate and he will speak to the staff involved.

http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2017/09/26/unsw-lecturer-deems--marriage--offensive.html

 

[Gronk]

'Marriage' deemed offensive by UNSW lecturers

Updated: 7:58 am, Tuesday, 26 September 2017

One of the country's top universities has warned maths students not to use the term 'marriage' when referring to a well-known theorem because the word may cause 'offence.'

The theorem was proved by Phillip Hall in 1935 and relies on the standard example of matchmaking men and women to represent two distinct sets.

The move by the University of New South Wales comes as student groups clash on campuses around the country on same sex marriage.

UNSW honours student Sean Lynch told Sky News that his lecturer asked students not to refer to the theorem as Hall's Marriage Theorem in an assignment.

'The reason why was because the canonical example has homophobic implications, at least in (lecturer Catherine Greenhill's) eyes,' Mr Lynch said.

He says that while same sex marriage was never explicitly mentioned, it's clear what staff members were referring to.

Senior lecturer and UNSW academic advisor, Dr Thomas Britz, says the advice was inappropriate and he will speak to the staff involved.

http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2017/09/26/unsw-lecturer-deems--marriage--offensive.html

Universities walking on egg shells so as to not to upset the philanthropic set ?

 

[Bazal]

'Marriage' deemed offensive by UNSW lecturers

Updated: 7:58 am, Tuesday, 26 September 2017

One of the country's top universities has warned maths students not to use the term 'marriage' when referring to a well-known theorem because the word may cause 'offence.'

The theorem was proved by Phillip Hall in 1935 and relies on the standard example of matchmaking men and women to represent two distinct sets.

The move by the University of New South Wales comes as student groups clash on campuses around the country on same sex marriage.

UNSW honours student Sean Lynch told Sky News that his lecturer asked students not to refer to the theorem as Hall's Marriage Theorem in an assignment.

'The reason why was because the canonical example has homophobic implications, at least in (lecturer Catherine Greenhill's) eyes,' Mr Lynch said.

He says that while same sex marriage was never explicitly mentioned, it's clear what staff members were referring to.

Senior lecturer and UNSW academic advisor, Dr Thomas Britz, says the advice was inappropriate and he will speak to the staff involved.

http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2017/09/26/unsw-lecturer-deems--marriage--offensive.html

What a farce. This whole trend of being offended by everything is hilarious

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

What a farce. This whole trend of being offended by everything is hilarious

I still reckon he had a point. There's no way you could know for sure that he's "far and away the worst marine biologist in history". It's just incredibly likely.

 

[Gronk]

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Universities walking on egg shells so as to not to upset the philanthropic set ?

No homophobe would ever be a philanthropist.

 

[84 Baby]

 

[Haynzy]

What a farce. This whole trend of being offended by everything is hilarious

The ever reliable Steve Hughes.

 

[Gronk]

There seems to be f**k all movies on at the moment.

Any worth seeing ?

It ?
Kingsman ?
American Assassin ?
Mother ! ?
American Made ?

Flatliners (re-make) starts Thursday.

 

[Gary Gutful]

Who has the patience to watch a movie these days?

 

[Incorrect]

Who has the patience to watch a movie these days?

Stopped reading at patience....

 

[Gronk]

Who has the patience to watch a movie these days?

I only go for the choc top.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Is that more like a Shanghai Cravat or a Provan-Summons Medal?