Is he? Can he bat?
Brayshaw seems to think so, but each time I've seen him, the grounds have been big enough to contain him
What I find fascinating is that James Faulkner would make any test side in the world not playing on a dust bowl batting at 8 or better, bar Safrica (Morkel, Steyn, Rabada and Philander - I'd probably have him ahead of Rabada but he is on the rise judging by those ODI games in India), and being the third or fourth seamer, and yet he cannot make the Australian team. When MMarsh who would not make any top 7 test team can make the Australian team on "batting potential".
Siddle being selected ahead of Faulkner is ridiculous now that Sids is 125-135kph.
Warner
Burns
Khwaja
Smith
Voges
Nevill
Faulkner FC batting ave 30+
Okeefe FC batting ave 28+
Starc FC 26 test 23
Hazelwood FC 14 but test 23
Pattinson FC 21 but test 30
That is a bloody strong tail with plenty of wicket taking ability and miserly overs from Faulkner and Hazelwood with strike power from Pattinson and Starc and Okeefe for tweak. The batting could be further strengthened by dropping Hazelwood for a batsman not from the Marsh family.