Queensland - Game 1 - How good were we

[Knightmare]

Ooooooh, swearing at fellow forumers now. You really showed me. I wish I could be as witty and articulate as you are. :lol:

 

[cornerposter]

I wish I could be as witty and articulate as you are. :lol:

Not likely, that missing chromosome doesn't help ya :lol::lol:

 

[kruzin]

:lol: show some love boys <3

 

[babyg]

While JT deserved his MOM, I thought Locky came real close.
Loved his kicking game and his speed of the line in defense.


Seconded. Thought Lockyer controled the team brilliantly.

 

[Big Pete]

The rest of the time they've been pretty ordinary helped by an intercept from Kimmorley and a bad pass from Hayne.

2005 wasn't 4 years ago.

Fortunately NSW have sent out dross except on 4 occasions where they won 2 dead rubbers and lost two games from an intercept from Kimmorley and a bad pass from Hayne.

Game 3 2007 was still dominated by Queensland who put up a valiant effort after losing four players part-way through that game. Their performance was still the talking point.

Didn't NSW base their 2010 Game 1 side on 2009 Game 3? Got them pretty far didn't it? Even then that Game 3 side was fairly overated.

It's just that NSW have been so regularly below par since game 2 2006 on.

Not game 1?

So when Queensland became awesome, automatically NSW became s**t?

Stupid NSWmen, you should actually watch the games and maybe then you'd realise why those teams look average.

Hint Large Hint: It's because Queensland makes them look average.