Comparing sam to gi has a huge flaw.
Name one player who can do what GI can.
.
.
Now name all the players who can do what Burgess can.
Gallen, mcguire,Vaughan, Bromwich, taumololo, fifita etc.
Like i said, I'd rather keep sam. But he is replaceable.
If losing sam is the cost of replacing the twins then i think it's worth it.
The arguement that we have to keep sam because he does everything is actually part of my arguement. If keeping sam means we have to keep the twins and pay huge amount for 2 players who contribute next to nothing then that extra sam does means nothing.
I actually don't think it has a huge flaw actually.
When GI was in his prime he was worth his money but now he's got such a crooked knee that it seems he could be spending more time off the field than on. Also it's a possibility GI could play at centre next season and paying a player 1million for centre is overs imo!!!!
I don't rate Jesse Bromwich in the same class as Sam. I don't think he has the same impact!!! He has some inconsistencies. Also I don't think McGuire comes close to the work rate Sam does.
Vaughan also has had a breakout season but can he keep up the consistency for seasons on end like Sam has????
I do put Sam in a similar class to Gallen though. Both are inspirational to their sides and have won a premiership and if they weren't in their sides both sides wouldn't have won the comp.
On Fifita I am yet to see him be consistent for seasons on end. Yes he is going great currently but his concentration and discipline can seem to waver at times. I'd take Sam any day over Fifita.
If you look at locks currently Taumalolo would be the elite one no contest. Hence he deserves 1 mil. 800k for Sam is about right.
Like Souths til I die said look what other players get. Some are getting more than Sam that aren't necessarily better!!!!!!!
The twins are on overs currently but imo Sam isn't.