bartman takes the fourth hit-up for the Eels, into some tough Dragons defence...
- - - - -
The New Technology…
Technology and sport can be a wonderful combination. As a kid in the 1970s, I remember my sense of captivated glee at the first on screen use of “the duck” to accompany a dismissed cricket batsman’s walk back to the pavilion, should he have been unfortunate enough to suffer the shame of being dismissed for zero runs[1].
The quaint sprite graphic wasn’t very advanced by today’s standards, but in my lifetime the duck has been the tip of the iceberg when it came to ways in which technology began to expand the experience of live sports and sports telecasting. Technology started to change the once staid gentleman’s game of cricket and has since had an impact on all sports really, including rugby league.
The use of technology in rugby league also developed in the 1970s, with the slow motion replay becoming an exciting feature in Sunday night’s television coverage of the selected match of the round. Of course this was back in the days when we didn’t take such technological wizardry for granted, and even commentators (like Rex “The Moose” Mossop) paused in silence while they – and lounge rooms across Australia – watched this new style of footage that many would never dreamed might be possible.
Fast forward thirty years, and it’s abundantly clear the central role that technology plays in our sport today. We have live television coverage of every game and each ground has a big screen to show close-up views and replays to the fans in attendance. Coaches use walkie talkies and bluetooth headsets from their boxes high in the stand to communicate instructions down to their associates and trainers on ground level. The referees and touch judges are wired up with microphones for instant communication, and fans at the game can even listen to the referee’s comments through that neat little invention we know as Sports Ears. And we now have decisions about tries as often as not referred up to a video referee, who attempts to make use of all this modern technology to split hairs and come up with a correct ruling.
So we have the technology… but especially in the case of video referee decisions, the technology doesn’t always make things perfect! Human error will always remain a factor in the use of even the most advanced technologies, especially within a sporting context. As the world turns and technology evolves (but human judgement as always remains forever flawed), you can’t help but wonder where things will end up in the future…
The most recent interaction between new technology, sports and human judgement that grabbed my attention came from the world of American basketball[2]. Mid-game, Milwaukee Bucks player Charlie Villanueva decided to send a “tweet” (a text-based post of up to 140 characters, in response to the prompt “What are you doing?”[3]) to fans of his Twitter feed following the half-time talk from his coach. These were the words of wisdom that Charlie shared with his “followers”:
“In da locker room, snuck to post my twitt. We're playing the Celtics, tie ball game at da half. Coach wants more toughness. I gotta step up.[2]”
If you’re a fan of Twitter, you’d probably think this is like, sooooo amazing. But if (like me) you can’t really see the point of Twitter, you’d probably find it all a bit strange… The key issue here though is that Charlie Villanueva became the first professional sportsman to use this social networking technology in the middle of a match to communicate “personally” to his fans about exactly what he was doing and thinking at that moment in time.
With our rugby league players’ infamous usage of mobile phone self-portrait photos (Todd Carney), text messages (Mark Gasnier) and facebook status updates, it can only be a matter of time before we see this Twitter fad also catch on in the NRL playing sheds and sidelines! Can you imagine…?
“Trainer kindly brought out my mobile while we r waiting for da conversion. That AFL looks like a fast sport, may not get time to tweet during games next year? Damn!”
“Time 4 a tweet while doing number 2s at half time. At least I made it out of da corridor this time.”
“Sh*t, just glassed the missus. Was an accident of course. In fact, it was such an accident that I might just tell em it was my flatmate? Any1 got any better ideas?”
Sometimes new technology just makes bigger twits of us all…
- - - - -
Word count: 748 words between the lines.
References:
[1]http://www.cricinfo.com/columns/content/story/297167.html
[2]http://blogs.abc.net.au/thesportsdesk/2009/03/half-time-tweet.html
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter